In our 5.0 release, we renamed all the file-document-box icons to text-box. This is a welcome change, however it clashes with an icon we already have simply called textbox. Importing both in @mdi/js, for example, looks like this:
import { mdiTextBox, mdiTextbox } from '@mdi/js';`
Not ideal.
We should rename our "form" based textbox, and a few others that match its intention, for better clarity.
textbox => form-field-textboxtextbox-lock => form-field-textbox-locktextbox-password => form-field-textbox-passwordtextarea => form-field-textareaIf there are others I missed, or make sense to follow this naming pattern, please feel free to edit and add them.
Could probably add date, time, color, number, image, file, email, phone, map-marker, select.
I'm not sure I actually view this as an issue. Maybe a 6.0 thing we can look at later on.
This is definitely a thing, I've already had several people reach out to me and complain today.
Okay, lets push these in 5.1.45? I think it could bite us for users that remove - from the names or ENUM values.
Reassigned to the 5.1.xx milestone. This is actually causing issues for third party scripts that consume meta.json. 馃槩
- is removed.Closing. We'll track the script seperately.