Mapbox-gl-js: Test interaction handlers, UI controls, and browser utilities
Figure out how to test our event handling and interaction modules.
testing
jfirebaugh
All 5 comments
Possible approaches:
- JSDom. Pro: likely less unpredictability / hard-to-debug timing issues than a browser environment. Con: likely lower fidelity event implementation.
- Reintroduce real-browser test suite using smokestack. Pro: higher fidelity. Con: https://twitter.com/tmcw/status/646345048142032896
- Selenium?
jfirebaugh
on 7 Oct 2015
lucaswoj
on 11 Mar 2016
JSDom. Pro: likely less unpredictability / hard-to-debug timing issues than a browser environment. Con: likely lower fidelity event implementation.
At this point in time, I would vote for this particular tradeoff. I think it would be the quickest way to get started and I'm betting a large majority of these tests would not require a super high fidelity event environment. (E.g. #2972 )
anandthakker
on 10 Aug 2016
👍2
+ browser utilities (i.e. js/util/browser/*.js) 馃槃
lucaswoj
on 25 Aug 2016
🎉1
We've been gradually filling these out.
jfirebaugh
on 14 Feb 2018
Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings
Related issues
infacq
路
3Comments
bgentry
路
3Comments
shotor
路
3Comments
foundryspatial-duncan
路
3Comments
samanpwbb
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
At this point in time, I would vote for this particular tradeoff. I think it would be the quickest way to get started and I'm betting a large majority of these tests would not require a super high fidelity event environment. (E.g. #2972 )