Magento 2.3.3 (at least I'm getting the problem with multiple instances 2.3.3, tested with both Firefox 70.0.1 (64-bit))
Page should work normally
Message appears (See screenshot)

Hi @onlinebizsoft. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:
Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:
@magento give me 2.3-develop instance - upcoming 2.3.x release
For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.
@onlinebizsoft do you confirm that you were able to reproduce the issue on vanilla Magento instance following steps to reproduce?
Hi @itsPranith. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: :point_down:
Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.[ ] 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.
[ ] 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.
[ ] 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[ ] 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
[ ] 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.
@magento give me 2.3-develop instance
Hi @itsPranith. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento 2.3-develop instance for you
Hi @itsPranith, here is your Magento instance.
Admin access: https://i-25502-2-3-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering/admin
Login: admin Password: 123123q
Instance will be terminated in up to 3 hours.
I am also experiencing this issue on 2.3.3. This is the 3rd issue I have seen with the tax module.
https://github.com/magento/magento2/issues/25020
https://github.com/magento/magento2/issues/25403
Any update on a fix?
@magento give me 2.3-develop instance
Hi @onlinebizsoft. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento 2.3-develop instance for you
Hi @onlinebizsoft, here is your Magento instance.
Admin access: https://i-25502-2-3-develop.instances.magento-community.engineering/admin
Login: admin Password: 123123q
Instance will be terminated in up to 3 hours.
Vertex seems to be not showing in configuration in latest 2.3-develop. Anyone has any idea?
Vertex is a bundled extension that is not part of this repository, and so is not in the 2.3-develop branch.
If you are not using Vertex for tax calculation, I recommend disabling the module for a performance improvement on this screen. The slowness is caused by a UIComponent heavy user interface for selecting flexible fields.
It is unlikely we'll have a solution in the near future for the performance issues a subset of merchants are experiencing. Again, my recommendation in this scenario is to disable the vertex module if you are not using it (bin/magento module:disable Vertex_Tax)
Hi @engcom-Echo. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: :point_down:
Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.[ ] 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.
[ ] 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.
[ ] 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[ ] 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
[ ] 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.
Hi @sdzhepa. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: :point_down:
Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.[ ] 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.
[ ] 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.
[ ] 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branchDetails
- Add the comment @magento give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
- If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and _stop verification process here_!
[ ] 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
[ ] 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.
Please find a patch addressing this issue here: https://gist.github.com/navarr/2ec2f22f71a769d8438fb237f58eabd4
This issue has been fixed as of Vertex 3.3.0 and will be included with Magento 2.3.4
@navarr
If we upgrade Vertex to version 3.3.0 for Magento Open source 2.3.3 Then the issue will resolve or not?
@amitbdigitalaptech The issue should resolve, yes.
@navarr
I don't think, it will work
I have tried by adding "vertex/module-tax": "3.3.0", at composer.json.
Getting below Error:
Updating dependencies (including require-dev)
Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages.
Problem 1
- magento/product-community-edition 2.3.3 requires vertex/product-magento-module 3.2.0 -> satisfiable by vertex/product-magento-module[3.2.0].
- magento/product-community-edition 2.3.3 requires vertex/product-magento-module 3.2.0 -> satisfiable by vertex/product-magento-module[3.2.0].
- vertex/product-magento-module 3.2.0 requires vertex/module-tax 3.2.0 -> satisfiable by vertex/module-tax[3.2.0] but these conflict with your requirements or minimum-stability.
- vertex/product-magento-module 3.2.0 requires vertex/module-tax 3.2.0 -> satisfiable by vertex/module-tax[3.2.0] but these conflict with your requirements or minimum-stability.
- Installation request for magento/product-community-edition 2.3.3 -> satisfiable by magento/product-community-edition[2.3.3].
Also, tried with composer update vertex/module-tax:3.3.0, it does not working. package is not updating.
@amitbdigitalaptech You need to add a replace directive to your composer.json:
replace: {
"vertex/product-magento-module": "*"
}
Then, if address validation is desired, you'll have to require that module separately (like tax)
@navarr
Thanks for all help
Can you please tell me, VertexSMB_TaxCE is Magento 1 module for vertax (officially)?
And How can I avoid tax apply for Some specify customer group at current M2 vertex module?
@amitbdigitalaptech: Customers can have a tax class or a tax code on their account. Both of these are sent to Vertex and you would create a taxability rule in vertex to avoid tax.
Most helpful comment
@amitbdigitalaptech The issue should resolve, yes.