Hey guys. I opened up a facebook group for loopback-next users to get help from each other; providing less saturation on SO and this issue group. Feel free to join/ask questions/help each other out. If this is not ok please let me know! Join here:
Thanks @vikramkh! We have created a Slack workspace earlier hoping to achieve a similar purpose. However, it has only been lightly use and we were discussing whether it's a good time to open it up for people to join. The downside for our Slack workspace is that since it's free, it only keeps the most recent 10,000 messages.
I'd like to hear from @strongloop/loopback-maintainers , especially @bajtos and @raymondfeng who had been given more thoughts on this.
No problem! I didn't know about the slack channel and no one has yet joined the facebook group :(. I'd gladly hand over the group moderation to an admin here, and maybe some promotion will encourage people to join, as I have personally found facebook groups to be very helpful in answering questions!
Indeed, FB groups are good, but it should be administered by Loopback. Perhaps moderators from the community, similar to Node JS Official FB groups.
Personally, I am strongly against Facebook because of moral reasons. Having said that, I am not going to enforce my opinions on others. If somebody likes to discuss LoopBack on Facebook, then I am fine with that, as long as I can stay away.
We already have a chat room on Gitter, see https://gitter.im/strongloop/loopback
Maybe we should publicize the Gitter room more? For example in our issue templates, see the discussion in https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-next/pull/4030
Maybe we should publicize the Gitter room more?
馃憤
I think we had some discussion in the past about Gitter room vs Slack.
Gitter room is better because:
Slack is better because:
I'm fine either way (also less favorable on Facebook too).
I like gitter/slack but the problem I usually have with chat channels is the confusion if multiple people ask questions. I thought facebook posts would allow for more segregated issues, and would show up while you're 'taking a break' or browsing social media rather than watching a specific channel, thereby allowing for more views per issue. I understand other concerns though.
@vikramkh, I think at this point, we prefer not to divert our effort in maintaining one more Facebook group. Feel free to keep your Facebook group though, and please also keep in mind we have other social media channels:
Again, as @bajtos mentioned:
We already have a chat room on Gitter, see https://gitter.im/strongloop/loopback
this seems to be the way our community helping each other out.
With these reasons, I'd like to close this issue. Thanks again for your interest in LoopBack!
Most helpful comment
Personally, I am strongly against Facebook because of moral reasons. Having said that, I am not going to enforce my opinions on others. If somebody likes to discuss LoopBack on Facebook, then I am fine with that, as long as I can stay away.
We already have a chat room on Gitter, see https://gitter.im/strongloop/loopback
Maybe we should publicize the Gitter room more? For example in our issue templates, see the discussion in https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-next/pull/4030