Even though parts of loopback-next are still in flux, I think it would be a good idea to begin building up a generator to rapidly spin up apps, rather than relying on the example as a template to bootstrap our own work.
This would be a good opportunity to properly dogfood the generator ourselves, as well as the design.
cc @bajtos @raymondfeng @ritch @superkhau @rashmihunt
@kjdelisle I've been discussing some of the CLI experience with @ritch for things that should happen soon, so +1 from me. However, I'm not sure if this should happen in the current generator/yeoman, etc.
My opinion:
loopback-cli. In the long term, we need to rework loopback-cli to not depend on yeoman, see https://github.com/strongloop/generator-loopback/issues/139Another thing to consider: integration with APIC Editor, possibly via loopback-workspace.
@kjdelisle, looks like we might need a spike to see what are the Yeoman equivalent we could possibly use for interactive command line user interfaces. Are you ok to change this as a spike?
@bajtos mentioned Inquirer in strongloop/generator-loopback#139.
cc @rashmihunt
duplicate of https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-next/issues/697 ?
Closing as complete, see https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-next/tree/master/packages/cli
Most helpful comment
My opinion:
loopback-cli. In the long term, we need to rework loopback-cli to not depend on yeoman, see https://github.com/strongloop/generator-loopback/issues/139Another thing to consider: integration with APIC Editor, possibly via loopback-workspace.