Lmms: Three options activated by default

[Gabrielxd195]

I would like some options to be activated by default. such as:

• Activate the oscilloscope by default.
• Name of the notes on the piano roll.
• HQ mode for output devices.

These options are helpful to users: notes on piano roll and oscilloscope. that's why I would like (if there are no problems) that these options come activated by default. but are disabled by default by '' saving '' resources or to '' improve performance '', do not you think they should be in the section '' Performance Configuration '' ?, I think it would be more intuitive if they are in that section.

[Spekular]

I agree with these except for the note labels. For me they're just clutter,
I expect many users know the keys on a piano and would feel the same.

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 03:00 Gabriel Lopez [e-mail] wrote:

I would like some options to be activated by default. such as:

• Activate the oscilloscope by default.
• Name of the notes on the piano roll.
• HQ mode for output devices.

[image: Kazam_screenshot_00000]
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26127693/59957546-516ab200-9467-11e9-8d4f-c9a46405fbed.png

These options are helpful to users: notes on piano roll and oscilloscope.
that's why I would like (if there are no problems) that these options come
activated by default. but are disabled by default by '' saving '' resources
or to '' improve performance '', do not you think they should be in the
section '' Performance Configuration '' ?, I think it would be more
intuitive if they are in that section.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/5053?email_source=notifications&email_token=ACEBLGXIDZ6DNL3WAF7UEHLP3V2TVA5CNFSM4H2VTY42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4G3CEGWQ,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEBLGUEMRQCS5H7REROJNDP3V2TVANCNFSM4H2VTY4Q
.

[Gabrielxd195]

I agree with these except for the note labels. For me they're just clutter, I expect many users know the keys on a piano and would feel the same.

You're right friend, this marked notes is more for a person who knows the musical notes; but remember that most users of LMMS are beginners, any detail however small that facilitates the workflow, is a point in favor of LMMS, since this program is very versatile and comfortable.

[Spekular]

I don't believe we should target beginners at the expense of more
experienced users though, that would cement LMMS's standing as a DAW "for
beginners" (implied: not for "real" producers). With the incredible
progress in 1.2 and master branch, I think LMMS has a great opportunity to
grow out of that label.

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 22:56 Gabriel Lopez [e-mail] wrote:

I agree with these except for the note labels. For me they're just
clutter, I expect many users know the keys on a piano and would feel the
same.

You're right friend, this marked notes is more for a person who knows the
musical notes; but remember that most users of LMMS are beginners, any
detail however small that facilitates the workflow, is a point in favor of
LMMS, since this program is very versatile and comfortable.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/5053?email_source=notifications&email_token=ACEBLGQ44DIZEBQJ44TT6Q3P32GWZA5CNFSM4H2VTY42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODYKRHFI#issuecomment-504697749,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEBLGTHNURWBV2FQCAHH6TP32GWZANCNFSM4H2VTY4Q
.

[Gabrielxd195]

I don't believe we should target beginners at the expense of more experienced users though, that would cement LMMS's standing as a DAW "for beginners" (implied: not for "real" producers). With the incredible progress in 1.2 and master branch, I think LMMS has a great opportunity to grow out of that label.

You're right, but the idea is not to adapt LMMS to beginners, but to implement small tools and options that together improve the workflow for both beginners and more experienced professionals. Nor do I believe that the default activation of a simple option: "note label" changes the concept of LMMS. if we have seen enough changes in stable and we dominate what makes LMMS become a real DAW.

[NETMANSKY]

@Spekular, @Gabrielxd195 I cant to name LMMS as sandbox and newbies tool. There is too difficult oriented for newbie in sound producing world without normally working FX presets base. I mean FX only and not default Instrument/FX preset chains.