Lighthouse: SEO Evaluation Error - Robots.txt

Created on 18 May 2018  Â·  10Comments  Â·  Source: GoogleChrome/lighthouse

Current build claims an SEO reduction / penalty for many pages listing robots.txt as marking pages blocked from indexing when this is not the case at all when pages are tested with multiple crawlers and with Google Search Console. Seems to be a bug in this build.

needs-more-info pending-close

Most helpful comment

lockebridge is fine
image

for strayangel, LH is complaining about a meta tag explicitly saying noindex, not the robots.txt
image

image

EDIT: the cached version that shows up in google is 4 days old and does not have the meta tag

All 10 comments

this message display on my website report "Search engines are unable to include your pages in search results if they don't have permission to crawl them."

Do you have a URL for us to take a look at @strayangelfilms?

please check this http://www.buildtrack.in/

Thanks for sharing @ashishdhade!

I'm seeing a 100 for SEO on that site
image

welcome @patrickhulce but please check this
buildtrack

Hello @patrickhulce

Try www.strayangel.com or www.lockebridge.com as two examples of sites with valid robot.txt that Lighthouse claims are being blocked but are not.

On May 18, 2018, at 9:22 AM, Patrick Hulce notifications@github.com wrote:

Do you have a URL for us to take a look at @strayangelfilms?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

lockebridge is fine
image

for strayangel, LH is complaining about a meta tag explicitly saying noindex, not the robots.txt
image

image

EDIT: the cached version that shows up in google is 4 days old and does not have the meta tag

Wow, you really saved my butt on this, there was a WooCommerce setting that was inadvertently telling the home page not to index! Very obscure and took 4 hours to track down. And here I am reporting bugs that aren’t bugs at all. Sorry!!! Thanks @patrickhulce !!!

no prob, glad it worked out :)

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings