I can do this. Can you please assign to me?
Thanks, I've assigned this to you. However, I feel issue needs some clarity. I'm not really sure what this issue is about.
Please @Priya103, at least state what you're intending to change so that @metacosm can validate.
Currently getScope is compared with string "Namespaced" in kubernetes-client however it is good to have this static string as enum.
Umm, Could you please share a link to the code where this getScope() is? I see a getScope() in CustomResourceDefinitionSpec but it's a part of model(which is generated)
I understand that having a set of scopes defined as an enum is preferred, there's no opposition in that.
What I don't know from the description of this issue is where are we going to change this.
From the recent work of Chris, I understand that we are talking about CustomResourceDefinitions. Are we?
But which classes are you intending to change, because the CustomResourceDefinition model is generated. So if you want to do this, a custom serializer + deserializer must be provided, and the generator tuned so that the field is declared as an enum instead of a plain String.
Then there's also the CustomResourceDefinitionContext which also provides this scope field and maybe is the one you are referring to since it's used in:
https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/blob/742207112e29c5f457bb918f750bec8002ff1822/kubernetes-client/src/main/java/io/fabric8/kubernetes/client/dsl/internal/CustomResourceOperationsImpl.java#L64-L66
I am talking about kubernetes-client/kubernetes-client/src/main/java/io/fabric8/kubernetes/client/dsl/internal/CustomResourceOperationsImpl.java and RawCustomResourceOperationsImpl
Yep, sorry this issue is suffering from tunnel vision where I expect everyone to immediately understand what the heck I'm talking about with only a couple of keywords! 馃槵
Sorry about that. Indeed, custom de-/serializer will be needed to make it cleaner, imo.
Most helpful comment
I understand that having a set of scopes defined as an enum is preferred, there's no opposition in that.
What I don't know from the description of this issue is where are we going to change this.
From the recent work of Chris, I understand that we are talking about CustomResourceDefinitions. Are we?
But which classes are you intending to change, because the
CustomResourceDefinitionmodel is generated. So if you want to do this, a custom serializer + deserializer must be provided, and the generator tuned so that the field is declared as anenuminstead of a plainString.Then there's also the
CustomResourceDefinitionContextwhich also provides thisscopefield and maybe is the one you are referring to since it's used in:https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/blob/742207112e29c5f457bb918f750bec8002ff1822/kubernetes-client/src/main/java/io/fabric8/kubernetes/client/dsl/internal/CustomResourceOperationsImpl.java#L64-L66