All 7 comments
auvipy
on 19 Dec 2019
What motivation do you have for considering redislite over redis in pypi? I have always used redis from pypi for Redis related integrations and it seems like the most apt choice as it correlates to the same Development team as the Redis server and I haven't had a need to consider other modules other than I also use fakeredis for mocking out the Redis server for unit testing.
matteius
on 19 Dec 2019
this is for getting consensus. you are one user and your use case doesn't mean anything else can be considered. in kombu 5 we might switch to the async version of all the libraries. but if that's really needed or provide better features.
auvipy
on 19 Dec 2019
So if for async then it should be titled around that for that motivation. aioredis (used by django channels redis) might be a better choice?
Otherwise why redislite?
jheld
on 17 Feb 2020
I agree it's not a good choice as most people aren't using it.
We'd probably use aioredis with trio-asyncio in Celery 5.
thedrow
on 17 Feb 2020
Should we close this issue?
jheld
on 20 Feb 2020
I think so.
thedrow
on 20 Feb 2020
Related issues
andyewen
路
6Comments
mjtamlyn
路
4Comments
mback2k
路
4Comments
ProTip
路
4Comments
terrycain
路
5Comments
Most helpful comment
What motivation do you have for considering redislite over redis in pypi? I have always used redis from pypi for Redis related integrations and it seems like the most apt choice as it correlates to the same Development team as the Redis server and I haven't had a need to consider other modules other than I also use fakeredis for mocking out the Redis server for unit testing.