Kitty: Kitty shrinks glyphs with their ink box wider than the advance width.

[be5invis]

cc. @jpotier

@jpotier built an Iosevka build with ligations, however Kitty zooms out the glyphs that having larger ink box. In Iosevka, there are glyphs that extends out the x=0 and x=500 boundary, to connect to other glyphs to form a ligature.

[jpotier]

Oh, I just opened the same bug >< I'll remove it

[be5invis]

Per @jpotier's font file, (download), the calt GSUB is defined like:

The hyphen glyph is replaced by a bar that overflows the left boundary to connect with the < glyph.

The other ligations are defined in the similar manner:

[kovidgoyal]

That's not going to work in kitty. There are two types of ligatures that will work, either substitute a single glyph for '<-' that is two chars wide or a dummy glyph + single glyph that is two chars wide with a negative left bearing. For example, from Fira Code for '<-'

hb-shape --cluster-level=1 --show-extents  ~/work/env/conf/fonts/FiraCode-Regular.otf '<-'     
[LIG=0+600<0,0,0,0>|less_hyphen.liga=1+600<-477,618,952,-610>]

Notice the first glyph is a dummy glyph and the second has a negative left bearing and is two cells wide. This pattern needs to be followed for most ligatures anyway, since they cannot typically be created by leaving some glyphs unchanged and changing only other glyphs. So stick to that pattern for all ligatures and it will work fine.

[be5invis]

@kovidgoyal
Well, in Iosevka, actually, the ligations could be arbitrary length, like this:

So, I cannot stick to that pattern.

[jpotier]

@kovidgoyal can the single glyph be of more that 2 times a base glyph width? In iosevka there's the WwW glyph, how does this one work?

[kovidgoyal]

Well, kitty is never going to support arbitrary length ligatures, as it works by storing cell level rendered bitmaps (technically alpha masks) on the GPU for performance, and that scheme has to have a finite max ligature length, otherwise glyph lookup times become too large.

@jpotier substitute N for 2 in my previous post and it remains the same. The only limitation is that in kitty the max value for N is 9. Basically N character string must be replaced by a ligature that is N glyphs wide.

[be5invis]

@kovidgoyal Hmmm, you will experience a lot of problems when dealing with complex scripts (like Indian scripts, Arabic, ...)

[jpotier]

Ok. So, only way to get it to work for me, would be to change how ligatures are done in the font. I have no experience in this field, though.

@be5invis well kitty is a terminal emulator. Maybe that's not going to be a problem :D

[kovidgoyal]

Yes, I know. I dont intend to ever support complex scripts in kitty. It is fundamentally a character grid, scripts that dont work in character grids are not going to be renderable.

[jpotier]

@be5invis How hard would it be for me to implement ligatures by glyph substitution for Iosevka? Any tools you know on Linux for that task?

[kovidgoyal]

@be5invis I'm not sure I understand why you want to support arbitrary length ligature in any case? If one wants to draw solid lines, the way to do it is to use the unicode box drawing characters, not replacing ------- with a ligature. Maybe there's some use case I am overlooking.

[be5invis]

@kovidgoyal You know, in functional languages like Haskell there are very long operators (look at them in Lens!), so, hmmm, I made the arbitrary-length operators.

[kovidgoyal]

I'm not familiar with Haskell -- but surely they are not arbitrarily sized operators! I imagine sticking to a max of five characters would be ample -- kitty itself supports ligatures of up to 9 characters, this is because of Source Code Pro with has ligatures for [WARNING]

[jpotier]

Prelude> (============================================================================================================) = (+)
Prelude> 1 ============================================================================================================ 1
2

@kovidgoyal nearly :D

[kovidgoyal]

Sure you can define large operators, you can do that in many languages, but are they actually used in practice? If you are going to have a ten character operator, it makes far more sense to use a function.

[jpotier]

I'm quite convinced that it's not the case. But I have no proof of that either.

[be5invis]

Hmmm
https://github.com/ekmett/lens/wiki/Operators

[be5invis]

For long operators it is hard to enumerate them all, so writing chaining GSUBs is a pretty simple solution for them.

[maximbaz]

Hey @be5invis, I just want to confirm with you, is it possible to compile Iosevka in a way so that the ligatures of size less than N (9) are supported in this terminal, but arbitrary-length ligations are not? Or that requires designing the font in a completely different manner, and thus we can declare that no Iosevka ligatures will ever work properly in kitty terminal?

I'm asking because while I support the engineering effort behind making ligatures as generic as possible that allows them to be of arbitrary length, in practice I _personally_ would be satisfied if I was able to use ligatures that are smaller than 9 characters.

_Cross-link to the issue in Iosevka repo for future reference: https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka/issues/248_

[be5invis]

@maximbaz There was a feature called "compLig", which can generate pre-composed glyphs and assign them to a PUA character so editors like Emacs can use it.
It is possible to write a contextual sub...

[EvanCarroll]

As a side note question on glyph size, i'm not sure of the burdon but it would be nice to have an 80 character tripple = glyph for the stupid terminal apps that use it for progress bars (like wget and such)

[kovidgoyal]

Such apps should be updated to use unicode box drawing characters
instead. No need to have unnatural contortions like 80 character wide
glyphs just to draw a progress bar.

[AndydeCleyre]

Kitty looks very cool, and I'd love to use it, but can't without Iosevka support. I don't see an open issue, so am subscribing here on the off-chance things change.

[blueyed]

@AndydeCleyre
https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka/issues/248#issuecomment-414131620 works good for me. (Would be great to have this packaged for Arch Linux (AUR).)

[AndydeCleyre]

@blueyed Looks like that workaround creates a hybrid font between Iosevka and Fira Code, which I'm not very interested in.

[kovidgoyal]

It's never going to change in kitty. Given the way that rendering works supporting infinite length ligatures is simply too high a performance cost. So unless you can convince the maintainers of iosevka to use a different approach for their ligatures, Iosevka is not going to work in kitty.