Today Apple announced the first devices in its lineup, including the Macbook Pro, to receive ARM-based processors. While it's an exciting time for many to upgrade, we ask that anyone relying on this device for Kibana development hold off for the time being.
Once we receive a device we will report here on the developer experience.
Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)
++
Anandtech is enthusiastic, based on how the A14 is already very performance competitive with Intel processors.
M1 should be thermally constrained to a much lower degree, and should have architectural improvements over the already impressive A14.
Plus its way superior performance per watt should inspire increasing use of ARM in the data centers.
Meanwhile Intel is losing benchmarks to AMD, due to lagging in fab process, likely an issue for the next 1-3 years.
Just got my Mac Mini, going to start recording some metrics and compare them to the macs I have around. Let me know what metrics you want to see?
Let me know what metrics you want to see?
Can you provide metrics for typescript type check?
node scripts/type_check --project=x-pack/tsconfig.json
node scripts/type_check --project=tsconfig.json
More so than specific metrics, I'm more interested in the ease of just getting to work. Notes like homebrew and node support are the most helpful in understanding on whether or not this is something that is actually worth it for me.
I haven't really dug into this much yet but if you know of anything else that might have rocky support, getting that outlined would be awesome.
Notes from an afternoon with the M1 Mac Mini:
All tests were run on commit 31014bfc9aa7df1ad71803d2be6bf23232fcbb02
Mac Mini: M1, 16GB, 1TB model, all code running under Rosetta 2 for now
MacBook Pro: 2019 15", 32GB, 2.4Ghz 8-Core i9
iMac Pro: 2017, 64GB, 3 GHz 10-Core Intel Xeon W
| task | Mac Mini | MacBook Pro | iMac Pro |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| yarn kbn bootstrap
without a yarn cache | 222s | 284s | 236s |
| yarn kbn clean
| 6s | 11s | 14s |
| yarn kbn bootstrap
with yarn cache | 206s | 185s | 186s |
| node scripts/build_kibana_platform_plugins
| 170s (4 workers) | 175s (8 workers) | 105s (10 workers) |
| yarn start
-> login page loaded | 210s | 200s | 129s |
| node scripts/jest
| 300s | 226s | 162s |
| node scripts/type_check --project=tsconfig.json
| first run: 16m40s, second: 14s | first run: 22m10s, second: 9s | first run: 20m44s, second: 11s |
| node scripts/type_check --project=x-pack/tsconfig.json
| 2m15s | 2m23s | 2m14s |
Biggest issue I expect will be the lack of support for dual external displays
Could you elaborate on that?
M1 Macs seem to only be able to run 1 external monitor through Thunderbolt ports. Mac Mini can run two external monitors but it's the exception (and still is the same total number of monitors compared to laptops): one over Thunderbolt and another over HDMI.
Most helpful comment
M1 Macs seem to only be able to run 1 external monitor through Thunderbolt ports. Mac Mini can run two external monitors but it's the exception (and still is the same total number of monitors compared to laptops): one over Thunderbolt and another over HDMI.
https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/11/11/how-apple-silicon-on-a-m1-mac-changes-monitor-support-and-what-you-can-connect