Are there any plans to support TouchID on the new MacBooks? This would be great to unlock the database...
Can you link to an API or perhaps a Qt extension?
Doesn't look too hard https://developer.apple.com/reference/localauthentication
This will include platform dependent code in the project (on Gnu/linux and windows there is no TouchID).
We should discuss this
Hardware support always needs platform dependent code. Perhaps you could make an abstraction and use system-provided APIs for each platform. fprint on GNU/Linux, Windows Biometric Framework on Windows, TouchID on macOS.
I support @dobegor's proposal. TouchID would greatly enhance the usability.
@TheZ3ro & @dobegor did you discuss about this great new feature?
+1 for improved usability for those with TouchID MBPs.
Would this also scale to fingerprint reading on iPhone and Android? None of the keepasss variants for mobile support fingerprint.
@droidmonkey, MiniKeepass supports Touch Id on iPhones.
Did you think about that feature? If you would add option to use fingerprint as password equivalent (so I could use my finger or password) on Windows, then I would definitely use it! For now I will probably use some workaround with software, which my fingerprint's manufacturer provides.
Keepass2android too can be configured to use fingerprint access.
On 1 Dec 2017 2:23 am, "Jonathan White" notifications@github.com wrote:
Would this also scale to fingerprint reading on iPhone and Android? None
of the keepasss variants for mobile support fingerprint.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/209#issuecomment-348373973,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMqpZC4IhJ3krklV-dYOi4ndni86TIsHks5s71T4gaJpZM4LtKY_
.
Well newer MBPs features a secure element which is capable of saving an secure key, which is readable after Touch ID Authentification.
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/certificate_key_and_trust_services/keys/storing_keys_in_the_secure_enclave
Due to my research Codesigning is a requirement for that.
I've done a first proof of concept which works out pretty good I'm going to publish the code soon
https://github.com/wiomoc/keepassxc/tree/feature/TouchID
As I mentioned earlier this needs Codesigning
sudo codesign --deep -f -s "Mac Developer: ...(**XYZ**)" --entitlements ../share/macosx/keepassxc.entitlements src/KeePassXC.app
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
<key>com.apple.application-identifier</key>
<string>**XYZ**.org.keepassx.keepassxc</string>
<key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key>
<string>**XYZ**</string>
<key>com.apple.developer.aps-environment</key>
<string>production</string>
<key>com.apple.security.network.client</key>
<true/>
<key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key>
<true/>
<key>com.apple.security.print</key>
<true/>
<key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key>
<false/>
<key>keychain-access-groups</key>
<array>
<string>**XYZ**.org.keepassx.keepassxc</string>
</array>
<key>com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-only</key>
<false/>
</dict>
</plist>
Any progress on this?
I would like to see fingerprint unlocking on Linux. too. I love it in my Android app. It also would be a great security enhancement. I tend to have the database open most of the time. If there where fingerprint unlocking I would lock the db immediately after each use.
Is the code signing the biggest obstacle?
I updated @wiomoc's solution a bit further and adapted it to the current state of the official development branch:

https://github.com/kolhagen/keepassxc/tree/feature/macos-touchid-support
-DWITH_XC_TOUCHID=ON@kolhagen can you submit as a PR please?
Any news on this making it into an official release?
Sorry, didn't notice the reference _right above the comment box_, I'm glad there is progress!
Merged into develop with #1851
Most helpful comment
Hardware support always needs platform dependent code. Perhaps you could make an abstraction and use system-provided APIs for each platform. fprint on GNU/Linux, Windows Biometric Framework on Windows, TouchID on macOS.