The built-in profiler package is not named quite like other Julia packages and I often find myself doing using Profiler
when I have to do using Profile
. Should we rename it?
I would like to work on this issue.What exactly do I have to do?
I 100% agree. I'm working on a big reorganization of the profiler on the sf/memprofiler
branch so I'll just roll this into that.
Eh... I don't think we can do this rename before the infrastructure allows it.
I like the proposal. Would the macro still be called @profile
? Or if the package is named Profiler
, will folks want it to be @profiler foo(args...)
?
Even though I like the noun for the "package" name, I kind of like the verb form for the action you want to take.
Even though I like the noun for the "package" name, I kind of like the verb form for the action you want to take.
Agreed.
Eh... I don't think we can do this rename before the infrastructure allows it.
What do you mean by this? You mean having depwarns for module bindings?
Most helpful comment
I like the proposal. Would the macro still be called
@profile
? Or if the package is namedProfiler
, will folks want it to be@profiler foo(args...)
?Even though I like the noun for the "package" name, I kind of like the verb form for the action you want to take.