Submitting author: @jGaboardi (James Gaboardi)
Repository: https://github.com/pysal/spaghetti
Version: v1.5.3
Editor: @usethedata
Reviewers: @martibosch
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jGaboardi. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@jGaboardi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=1.54 s (102.7 files/s, 67303.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML 30 2129 30 24974
CSS 41 1223 391 14648
SVG 4 0 0 14102
JavaScript 17 3482 2908 11727
Jupyter Notebook 14 0 15845 3240
Python 9 1144 2410 2185
Markdown 8 227 0 1151
TeX 2 58 4 745
YAML 18 5 51 375
reStructuredText 13 131 175 99
DOS Batch 1 8 1 27
make 1 7 6 19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 158 8414 21821 73292
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '0bded99297ebd6a7f8e1b697' was
gathered on 2020/10/31.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
David Folch 5 91 32 0.05
James Gaboardi 738 113961 89808 88.29
Jay 43 5374 6985 5.36
Phil Stephens 1 0 2 0.00
Philip Stephens 2 112 193 0.13
Serge 3 1885 1858 1.62
Serge Rey 59 5823 4096 4.30
Sergio Rey 2 47 75 0.05
Stefanie Lumnitz 1 0 231 0.10
ljw 1 66 4 0.03
ljwolf 6 22 81 0.04
rahul799 2 9 10 0.01
sjsrey 1 18 2 0.01
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
James Gaboardi 23846 20.9 14.2 16.04
Serge Rey 7 0.1 26.3 28.57
ljwolf 3 13.6 17.9 0.00
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.3390/ijgi4020815 is OK
- 10.1111/gean.12211 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1343650 is OK
- 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00674.x is OK
- 10.1002/9781119967101 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3379659 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3669853 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3509134 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1472807 is OK
- 10.1007/s11067-018-9427-9 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_11 may be a valid DOI for title: PySAL: A Python Library of Spatial Analytical Methods
INVALID DOIs
- None
@whedon invite @usethedata as editor
:wave: @usethedata - are you available to take on an additional paper currently? @bstabler would be the obvious editor to take this paper but he's currently unable to edit for JOSS.
@usethedata has been invited to edit this submission.
@arfon, Lorena Mesa or Leonardo Uieda may be nice fits for editor if @usethedata is not available.
Potentional Reviewers
I've got capacity to handle this and have no conflicts of interest with any of the authors.
@whedon assign @usethedata as editor
OK, the editor is @usethedata
@jGaboardi Thanks for the suggestions of reviewers.
Update. Decline and no response on my first request. Sending some additional reviewer requests. Some do this through tagging on the issue, but I prefer, when possible, to do so by email based on my perspectives around privacy.
Update. Decline and no response on my first request. Sending some additional reviewer requests. Some do this through tagging on the issue, but I prefer, when possible, to do so by email based on my perspectives around privacy.
Thanks for the update. Let me know if there is anything I can do.
@jGaboardi Thanks. Nothing in particular at this time. I have your list and a few others that have volunteered. Unlike some other papers I've done, I don't think finding reviewers will be a huge problem. Declines and no response aren't that unusual, and lots of people are in very challenging situations from time to time.
one more decline. Additional request sent out this morning.
@whedon assign @martibosch as reviewer
OK, @martibosch is now a reviewer
Still looking for the second reviewer, but I have one, so I'm opening the review issue and will add the second reviewer when I get an accept.
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2826.