Submitting author: @wtbarnes (Will Barnes)
Repository: https://gitlab.com/LMSAL_HUB/aia_hub/aiapy
Version: v0.3.0
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @hayesla, @samaloney
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @wtbarnes. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@wtbarnes if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=0.14 s (542.1 files/s, 31819.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 38 521 1293 1640
reStructuredText 27 146 98 318
YAML 5 16 30 99
Markdown 1 18 0 55
INI 1 10 0 55
TOML 1 10 0 38
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 75 733 1429 2240
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'caa2b3fe2d4dcb9e45a5138a' was
gathered on 2020/10/28.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Albert Y. Shih 1 81 0 0.49
David Stansby 1 61 5 0.40
Georgios Chintzoglou 2 418 99 3.16
Mark Cheung 7 705 23 4.44
Nicholas Padmanabhan 8 822 439 7.70
Nina Shirman 1 559 0 3.41
Paul Wright 2 77 9 0.52
Stuart Mumford 2 164 1383 9.44
Will Barnes 47 6959 4467 69.73
mbobra 1 74 41 0.70
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Albert Y. Shih 69 85.2 5.8 17.39
David Stansby 61 100.0 0.0 3.28
Georgios Chintzoglou 134 32.1 5.1 14.93
Mark Cheung 22 3.1 4.9 45.45
Nina Shirman 46 8.2 12.2 6.52
Paul Wright 63 81.8 1.0 11.11
Stuart Mumford 157 95.7 6.2 30.57
Will Barnes 2850 41.0 8.5 18.77
mbobra 52 70.3 6.4 82.69
PDF failed to compile for issue #2795 with the following error:
Can't find any papers to compile :-(
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Possible suggested reviewers:
Laura Hayes: hayesla
Shane Maloney: samaloney
Matt Craig: mwcraig
Shreyas Bapat: shreyasbapat
@whedon assign me as editor
OK, the editor is @arfon
:wave: @hayesla and @samaloney - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The software (_aiapy: A Python Package for Analyzing Solar EUV Image Data from AIA_) we'd be asking you to review is here: https://gitlab.com/LMSAL_HUB/aia_hub/aiapy and the associated short paper is here.
Hey @arfon - yes I'm happy to review this submission to JOSS
Great, thanks @hayesla. I'll add you here now but won't actually open the review thread (a separate issue) until I've identified a second reviewer.
@whedon add @hayesla as reviewer
OK, @hayesla is now a reviewer
Hi @arfon I'm also happy to review this JOSS submission
@whedon add @samaloney as reviewer
OK, @samaloney is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2801.
@hayesla, @samaloney, @wtbarnes - see you over in #2801 where the actual review will take place.
Most helpful comment
Hey @arfon - yes I'm happy to review this submission to JOSS