Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: effectsize: Estimation and Interpretation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters

[whedon]

Submitting author: @mattansb (Mattan S. Ben-Shachar)
Repository: https://github.com/easystats/effectsize
Version: 0.4.0.001
Editor: @mikldk
Reviewers: @trashbirdecology, @jkarreth
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mattansb. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mattansb if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.14 s (610.7 files/s, 91608.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               67           1350           2637           4361
XML                              1              0             42           1484
Rmd                              8            694            938            441
Markdown                         8            165              0            420
TeX                              1             90              0            329
YAML                             3             33              5            212
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            88           2332           3622           7247
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '9b72d65fe2d9b84e65ec607b' was
gathered on 2020/10/28.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Daniel                           2            60            502           55.42
Dominique Makowski               1           198              0           19.53
mattansb                         2           249              5           25.05

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #2794 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf from branch paper

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch paper. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@mattansb - thanks for your submission to JOSS. Could you please suggest an alternative title for your paper without the innuendo?

[mattansb]

@arfon An alternative title would be "effectsize: Estimation and Interpretation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters".
Would that be acceptable?

For reviewers, we would like to suggest Guy Prochilo (gprochilo), Tristan Mahr (tjmahr) or Matt Craddock (craddm).

Thanks!

[mattansb]

@arfon I've changed the title.

[mattansb]

@whedon generate pdf from branch paper

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch paper. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@whedon invite @mikldk as editor

:wave: @mikldk - would you be able to edit this submission for JOSS?

[whedon]

@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission.

[mikldk]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @mikldk

[mikldk]

@whedon check references from branch paper

[whedon]

Attempting to check references... from custom branch paper

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1037/1082-989X.9.2.164 is OK
- 10.1002/9780470743386.ch7 is OK
- 10.1136/bmj.f7450 is OK
- 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02445 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2074621 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[mikldk]

@trashbirdecology, @tbrown122387: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

[tbrown122387]

@mikldk sorry I’m really busy at the moment

[mikldk]

@kellieotto: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

[trashbirdecology]

@whedon assign @Trashbirdecology as reviewer

I can review this, but only because the logo is so amazing.

oh, maybe whedon doesn't recognize my authority

[kellieotto]

@mikldk I don't have the bandwidth to do a review right now - sorry!

[mikldk]

@mdogucu: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

[mdogucu]

I unfortunately cannot commit to do a review now.

[mikldk]

@pboesu, @jkarreth: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

[jkarreth]

@mikldk yes, I'll be happy to review this - but would need to take advantage of the extended JOSS time frame, so I'd get my review in by mid-December (and will try for earlier of course)

[pboesu]

@mikldk Unfortunately I do not have capacity for this review at the moment.

[mikldk]

@whedon add @trashbirdecology as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @trashbirdecology is now a reviewer

[mikldk]

@whedon add @jkarreth as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @jkarreth is now a reviewer

[mikldk]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2815.