Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: Cellocity: A Python package for analysis of confluent cell layer dynamics

Created on 28 Oct 2020  路  17Comments  路  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @oftatkofta (Jens Eriksson)
Repository: https://github.com/Oftatkofta/cellocity
Version: 1.0.0
Editor: @jni
Reviewers: @rfezzani, @aplyer
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @oftatkofta. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@oftatkofta if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
Makefile Python TeX pre-review

Most helpful comment

@whedon assign me as editor

I have fairly low bandwidth this month but this is definitely in my wheelhouse! We just yesterday finished adding some PIV datasets to skimage! :joy: @Oftatkofta thanks for this work, apologies if I move a bit slow but I'll try to get reviewers lined up ASAP and get the process started!

All 17 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.10 s (283.9 files/s, 42095.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           9            761            858           1241
TeX                              2             28              2            300
reStructuredText                 6            207            115            266
Markdown                         5             31              0             81
YAML                             2             10             12             35
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             2              4              7             11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            27           1049            995           1960
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '65f3e251fddc6365d8bae5a1' was
gathered on 2020/10/28.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Jens Eriksson                  136          8740           5878           99.73
Mikael E. Sellin                 1            18             20            0.26
jrijn                            1             1              1            0.01

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Jens Eriksson              2842           32.5          4.7               11.44
Mikael E. Sellin             17           94.4          1.9               11.76
jrijn                         1          100.0          1.3                0.00
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41467-018-05578-7 is OK
- 10.1038/nmat4848 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 is OK
- 10.1109/TIM.2010.2047149 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.02.032 is OK
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.12.001 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102114 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3930343 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/3-540-45103-x_50 may be a valid DOI for title: Two-Frame Motion Estimation Based on Polynomial Expansion

INVALID DOIs

- None

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

@whedon invite @lpantano as editor

:wave: @lpantano - would you be able to take on this submission for us?

@lpantano has been invited to edit this submission.

Hi Arfon, the papers seems interesting, but I don鈥檛 know about microscopy :( I don鈥檛 think I can handle well this edit.

@whedon invite @jni as editor

:wave: @jni - would you feel comfortable taking on a third paper?

@jni has been invited to edit this submission.

@whedon assign me as editor

I have fairly low bandwidth this month but this is definitely in my wheelhouse! We just yesterday finished adding some PIV datasets to skimage! :joy: @Oftatkofta thanks for this work, apologies if I move a bit slow but I'll try to get reviewers lined up ASAP and get the process started!

OK, the editor is @jni

@whedon assign @rfezzani as reviewer

OK, @rfezzani is now a reviewer

@whedon add @aplyer as reviewer

OK, @aplyer is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2818.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings