Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: climpred: Verification of weather and climate forecasts
Submitting author: @bradyrx (Riley Brady)
Repository: https://www.github.com/pangeo-data/climpred
Version: v2.1.1
Editor: @dhhagan
Reviewers: @neerajdhanraj, @darothen
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @bradyrx. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@bradyrx if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
whedon
All 35 comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=0.34 s (611.8 files/s, 104205.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 56 2196 4104 8712
reStructuredText 109 902 730 1731
Jupyter Notebook 18 0 14564 1039
TeX 1 30 0 348
YAML 12 17 18 329
Markdown 6 45 0 225
JSON 2 22 0 174
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
Bourne Shell 1 4 0 10
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 207 3228 19424 12603
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository 'feb745cbe8940dbfcfc14144' was
gathered on 2020/10/17.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
AS 20 1668 1336 3.98
Aaron Spring 134 19313 9302 37.92
Andrew 3 720 620 1.78
Andrew Huang 3 153 26 0.24
Kathy Pegion 3 207 42 0.33
Riley Brady 50 8753 6906 20.75
Riley X. Brady 252 13520 11501 33.16
aaronspring 5 692 146 1.11
ahuang11 8 228 105 0.44
bradyrx 17 198 25 0.30
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
AS 359 21.5 16.0 8.64
Aaron Spring 7789 40.3 6.8 9.95
Andrew 278 38.6 16.1 17.63
Andrew Huang 7 4.6 17.1 28.57
Kathy Pegion 41 19.8 9.2 19.51
Riley Brady 6533 74.6 6.7 7.79
ahuang11 5 2.2 16.8 0.00
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10/f89qdf is OK
- 10/ggtpks is OK
- 10/gd7hfq is OK
- 10/f782pf is OK
- 10/gbpwpt is OK
- 10/f4jjvf is OK
- 10/dp65gs is OK
- 10/f5w2xr is OK
- 10/gdqdmw is OK
- 10/gfxr7x is OK
- 10/gf4wzh is OK
- 10/f7r9st is OK
- 10/gf48c9 is OK
- 10/gdsnf8 is OK
- 10/gg9ss8 is OK
- 10/gc9wzk is OK
- 10/dpsjbp is OK
- 10/ggvcqv is OK
- 10/ggkt9s is OK
- 10/gfz6s5 is OK
- 10/gdb424 is OK
- 10/ggtbv2 is OK
- 10/gddfcs is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1201/9780203734636-38 may be a valid DOI for title: Deterministic nonperiodic flow
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
whedon
on 17 Oct 2020
👋 @jedbrown - any chance you can take on this submission as editor?
danielskatz
on 17 Oct 2020
@whedon invite @jedbrown as editor
danielskatz
on 17 Oct 2020
@whedon invite @jedbrown as editor
arfon
on 18 Oct 2020
@jedbrown has been invited to edit this submission.
whedon
on 18 Oct 2020
A great reviewer would be Chris Kadow (ckadow), but he might be too busy to review here.
Based on the list of approved reviewers:
- Eviatar Bach (eviatarbach)
Ryan Abernathy (rabernat)(runspangeowhere package lives)Kelly Kochanski (kellykochanski)(same university)- Neeraj Bokde (neerajdhanraj)
- Damien Irving (DamienIrving)
- Sarat Sreepathi (sarats)
- Ali Ramadhan (ali-ramadhan)
- Nikolay Koldunov (koldunovn)
- Andrew Bennett (arbennett)
- Philipp Sommer (Chilipp)
bradyrx
on 18 Oct 2020
@danielskatz This looks cool, but I'm conflicted (lead author is also at CU Boulder).
PS: as is Kelly (in reviewer list above)
jedbrown
on 20 Oct 2020
Sorry I missed that - I assume @openjournals/jose-eics will make a different editor invitation
danielskatz
on 20 Oct 2020
@danielskatz This looks cool, but I'm conflicted (lead author is also at CU Boulder).
PS: as is Kelly (in reviewer list above)
Hi Jed! Bummer I didn't meet you during my time here -- glad to see a fellow Buff here. Kelly is a good friend of mine, although we haven't collaborated directly. I crossed her name out above to avoid CU Boulder bias. Thanks!
bradyrx
on 20 Oct 2020
@danielskatz I think you meant openjournals/joss-eics... 😄
@dhhagan could you instead edit this submission? Thanks!
kyleniemeyer
on 20 Oct 2020
@whedon invite @dhhagan as editor
kyleniemeyer
on 20 Oct 2020
@dhhagan has been invited to edit this submission.
whedon
on 20 Oct 2020
@kyleniemeyer Yup.
dhhagan
on 20 Oct 2020
@whedon assign @dhhagan as editor
dhhagan
on 20 Oct 2020
OK, the editor is @dhhagan
whedon
on 20 Oct 2020
👋 @darothen @eviatarbach @sarats @neerajdhanraj: would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines.
dhhagan
on 21 Oct 2020
Yeah, I would like to review this submission.
neerajdhanraj
on 21 Oct 2020
@whedon add @neerajdhanraj as reviewer
dhhagan
on 21 Oct 2020
OK, @neerajdhanraj is now a reviewer
whedon
on 21 Oct 2020
Can someone please tell me where to provide the comments on the manuscript?
neerajdhanraj
on 21 Oct 2020
Hi @neerajdhanraj After I identify another reviewer, I will officially start the review which will take place in a new issue on GitHub. There will be checkboxes you can check off as the review progresses and you will comment either directly in that issue or on the software's original repository. An example of what that process looks like can be found here. I hope to have the reviewer list locked down within the next few days.
dhhagan
on 21 Oct 2020
Great, I got your point.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:03 PM David H Hagan notifications@github.com
wrote:
Hi @neerajdhanraj https://github.com/neerajdhanraj After I identify
another reviewer, I will officially start the review which will take place
in a new issue on GitHub. There will be checkboxes you can check off as the
review progresses and you will comment either directly in that issue or on
the software's original repository. An example of what that process looks
like can be found here
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1075. I hope to
have the reviewer list locked down within the next few days.—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2759#issuecomment-713876137,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRM6DBIGHXEPYTSDIWU5G3SL5EDLANCNFSM4SUOAGFA
.
neerajdhanraj
on 21 Oct 2020
Thank you for considering me as a reviewer! While I would love to review this submission, I would unfortunately not be able to do it until December. So if that is okay with @bradyrx I would be happy to do it, but you may want a speedier review.
eviatarbach
on 23 Oct 2020
I think we'd prefer a speedier reviewer if possible, but if that's difficult to arrange we would be fine with December!
bradyrx
on 23 Oct 2020
@dhhagan I would be happy to serve as a reviewer if you still need one.
darothen
on 24 Oct 2020
@darothen Great! I'll add you as a reviewer.
dhhagan
on 25 Oct 2020
@whedon add @darothen as a reviewer
dhhagan
on 25 Oct 2020
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@whedon commands
@whedon add @darothen as reviewer
dhhagan
on 25 Oct 2020
OK, @darothen is now a reviewer
whedon
on 25 Oct 2020
@whedon start review
dhhagan
on 25 Oct 2020
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2781.
whedon
on 25 Oct 2020
Related issues
whedon
·
11Comments
whedon
·
6Comments
whedon
·
12Comments
whedon
·
8Comments
whedon
·
12Comments