Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems

[whedon]

Submitting author: @mossr (Robert Moss)
Repository: https://github.com/sisl/POMDPStressTesting.jl
Version: v0.4.2
Editor: @sbenthall
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mossr. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mossr if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.10 s (381.6 files/s, 84062.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              1              0              0           3323
Julia                           30            729            195           2236
Markdown                         3             42              0            174
TeX                              1             18              0            140
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           1383             61
TOML                             1              4              0             36
YAML                             1              4              1             24
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            38            797           1579           5994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2655' was gathered on 2020/09/10.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-97301-2_5 is OK
- 10.1109/DASC.2015.7311450 is OK
- 10.1109/IVS.2018.8500400 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-540-75538-8_7 is OK
- 10.1023/A:1010091220143 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-19835-9_21 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-14295-6_17 is OK
- 10.1109/TCAD.2018.2858463 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[danielskatz]

@mossr - Please add an explicit "Statement of need" section to your paper, then add @whedon generate pdf as a new comment here to regenerate the pdf

[danielskatz]

👋 @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - I wonder if you might be able to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@whedon invite @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor

[whedon]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman has been invited to edit this submission.

[mossr]

@whedon regenerate pdf

[whedon]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

[mossr]

@whedon regenerate pdf

[whedon]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

[mossr]

@whedon regenerate pdf

[mossr]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[danielskatz]

@whedon regenerate pdf

ooops - sorry about that....

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@danielskatz

wave @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - I wonder if you might be able to edit this submission?

I can take it if nobody else can, however this is quite far from my domain of expertise so it may take me a while to find suitable reviewers.

[danielskatz]

@whedon invite @bstabler as editor

[whedon]

@bstabler has been invited to edit this submission.

[danielskatz]

👋 @bstabler - would you be willing to edit this submission?

[bstabler]

@danielskatz - I am interested in learning more about Julia. However, I just read the paper and I don't think it's a good fit for my expertise either. I can shepherd it along though if needed. Thanks.

[sbenthall]

This one is up my alley. I can edit it.

[sbenthall]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @sbenthall

[sbenthall]

@r-barnes would you be able to review this article?

[sbenthall]

@pandaconstantin would you be able to review this article?

[sbenthall]

@kavir1698 would you be able to review this article?

[sbenthall]

@vchuravy would you be able to review this article?

[kavir1698]

Yes, I would.

[sbenthall]

Thank you @kavir1698 !

[sbenthall]

@whedon assign @kavir1698 as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @kavir1698 is now a reviewer

[kavir1698]

I am sorry but I mistakenly commented here instead of another review request. I have to reject this request.

[sbenthall]

Oh. Bummer. I'll remove you from the reviewer list.

[sbenthall]

@whedon remove @kavir1698 as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @kavir1698 is no longer a reviewer

[sbenthall]

@ninjin would you be able to review this article?

[sbenthall]

@jarvist would you be able to review this article?

[ninjin]

@sbenthall: Teaching this term and things are in a complete state of chaos due to remote teaching, so sadly I can not handle any reviews at this moment.

[jarvist]

@jarvist would you be able to review this article?

Having looked quickly at the package, my expertise is close enough that I could review it. With the start of term I'm also quite busy, so it may take a few weeks to schedule in.
If that's an OK timetable, then please do assign me as a reviewer!

[sbenthall]

That timetable is fine. Thank you, @jarvist

[sbenthall]

@whedon assign @jarvist as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @jarvist is now a reviewer

[sbenthall]

@sambitdash Would you be able to review this article?

[sambitdash]

Sure will do. @sbenthall

[sbenthall]

Thank you @sambitdash !

[sbenthall]

@whedon add @sambitdash as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @sambitdash is now a reviewer

[sbenthall]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2749.