Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: StatAid: a R package with a graphical user interface for data analysis

[whedon]

Submitting author: @VincentAlcazer (Vincent Alcazer)
Repository: https://github.com/VincentAlcazer/StatAid
Version: v1.0
Editor: @mikldk
Reviewers: @nistara, @adithirgis
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @VincentAlcazer. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@VincentAlcazer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.37 s (123.4 files/s, 26453.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                             5              0              0           4702
R                               32           1231            851           2762
Markdown                         5             70              0            135
TeX                              1              4              0             32
HTML                             1              0              0              9
YAML                             1              0              0              8
Rmd                              1             17             32              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            46           1322            883           7654
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2609' was gathered on 2020/08/30.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.18637/jss.v014.i09 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kthyng]

Hi @mikldk can you edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@whedon invite @mikldk as editor

[whedon]

@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission.

[mikldk]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @mikldk

[mikldk]

@VincentAlcazer Thank you for this submission. Do you have any reviewers in mind (e.g. from the list of people mentioned above)?

The title of the paper has "a R package". This should be changed to "an R package" (or maybe even "An R package").

[VincentAlcazer]

@mikldk Thank you for your comment. Based on the list, I could suggest @adithirgis who seems to have an expertise in data analysis and Shiny apps, and @nistara who seems to be comfortable with health-related areas.

I am making the change for the title.

[VincentAlcazer]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[nistara]

I'd be happy to review this submission; it looks really interesting.

[mikldk]

@whedon assign @nistara as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @nistara is now a reviewer

[mikldk]

@adithirgis: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

[adithirgis]

Hi,

Thanks, I would be happy to review it. I will be able to start only
in a couple of days though. I hope that's ok?

Thanks!

On Wed 2 Sep, 2020, 1:20 AM Mikkel Meyer Andersen, [e-mail]
wrote:

@adithirgis https://github.com/adithirgis: Would you be interested in
reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software
https://joss.theoj.org/? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The
reviewer guidelines are available here:
https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you
have any questions or concerns please let me know.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2609#issuecomment-685094891,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APD6LDLE6Q3PUON3MZGCHTLSDVF7RANCNFSM4QPUYWUA
.

[mikldk]

@adithirgis That's fine. Thank you.

[mikldk]

@whedon add @adithirgis as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @adithirgis is now a reviewer

[mikldk]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2630.