Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: biopeaks: a graphical user interface for feature extraction from heart- and breathing biosignals

Created on 23 Aug 2020  ยท  26Comments  ยท  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @JanCBrammer (Jan C. Brammer)
Repository: https://github.com/JanCBrammer/biopeaks
Version: v1.4.0
Editor: @oliviaguest
Reviewers: @TomDonoghue, @sappelhoff, @jamesheathers
Managing EiC: Lorena A Barba

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JanCBrammer. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@JanCBrammer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
pre-review

Most helpful comment

OK, @TomDonoghue is now a reviewer

All 26 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/ZENODO.3597887 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 is OK
- 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90009-7 is OK
- 10.1080/03091902.2019.1640306 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-011-0107-7 is OK
- 10.1088/0967-3334/37/7/N38 is OK
- 10.1111/1469-8986.3510127 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0076585 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6579/aad7e6 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.25080/majora-92bf1922-00a may be missing for title: Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

@whedon check repository

@whedon invite @jni as editor

@jni has been invited to edit this submission.

๐Ÿ‘‹ hi @jni โ€” it looks like you are the only JOSS editor with both Python and biology among their listed expertise! Let us know if you can handle this one through review. Thanks!

Suggestions for potential reviewers: ihrke, kylemath, lbugnon, wmvanvliet, TomDonoghue, ixjlyons.

@labarba (๐Ÿ‘‹!) sorry, unfortunately I don't have the bandwidth to take on one more paper right now... (But @JanCBrammer thanks for the reviewer suggestions! They will make the editor's job much easier!)

@jni, no worries, thanks for the quick response! @labarba, alternatively the following editors seem to fit the subject domain: oliviaguest, cMadan, arokem.

@whedon invite @oliviaguest as editor

@oliviaguest has been invited to edit this submission.

๐Ÿ‘‹ @oliviaguest โ€” can you take this extra submission to handle? I know you are already handling two others, but the other two suggested editors are listed in 'reduced mode' on our tracking. Tough times!

I can do this, yes. ๐Ÿ˜„

@whedon assign @oliviaguest as editor

OK, the editor is @oliviaguest

@whedon add @TomDonoghue as reviewer

OK, @TomDonoghue is now a reviewer

OK, @ sappelhoff is now a reviewer

@whedon add @sappelhoff as reviewer

OK, @sappelhoff is now a reviewer

@whedon add @jamesheathers as reviewer

OK, @jamesheathers is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2621.

Hi, @JanCBrammer, @TomDonoghue, @sappelhoff, @jamesheathers, please on over to #2621 to get the review started! ๐Ÿ˜Š

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings