Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: Social-Annotate: Browser extension to annotate and collect social media data
Submitting author: @onurvarol (Onur Varol)
Repository: https://github.com/uluturki/social-annotate
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @lorenanicole
Reviewers: @davekinkead, @sara-02
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @onurvarol. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @kakiac.
@onurvarol if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
whedon
All 51 comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper
whedon
on 28 Jul 2020
Reference check summary:
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p18-1022 may be missing for title: A stylometric inquiry into hyperpartisan and fake news
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.115 may be missing for title: Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots
- https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701444 may be missing for title: HCI browser: A tool for studying web search behavior
- https://doi.org/10.1109/asonam.2016.7752207 may be missing for title: Stop clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934266 may be missing for title: VASSL: A Visual Analytics Toolkit for Social Spambot Labeling
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069958 may be missing for title: Comparing the quality of crowdsourced data contributed by expert and non-experts
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=2.37 s (48.0 files/s, 36483.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 39 10830 12986 51612
CSS 8 108 95 7475
JSON 41 2 0 1340
Sass 3 86 0 551
Markdown 9 196 0 380
HTML 5 55 5 335
SVG 1 0 0 288
TeX 1 12 0 103
Ruby 2 10 2 38
Bourne Shell 3 20 8 29
Python 1 12 0 24
YAML 1 0 0 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 114 11331 13096 62180
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '2530' was gathered on 2020/07/28.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
[email protected] 26 75173 576 49.72
uluturki 46 75636 971 50.28
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
[email protected] 74456 99.0 12.2 17.36
uluturki 74776 98.9 13.0 17.63
Hi @usethedata! You've been suggested as the editor for this submission. Interested?
kthyng
on 28 Jul 2020
@whedon invite @usethedata as editor
kthyng
on 28 Jul 2020
@usethedata has been invited to edit this submission.
whedon
on 28 Jul 2020
Sorry @usethedata — I got my tabs mixed up. Please ignore this invitation. I will go invite you on the proper tab!
kthyng
on 28 Jul 2020
@lorenanicole! Are you interested in editing this submission?
kthyng
on 28 Jul 2020
@whedon invite @lorenanicole as editor
kthyng
on 28 Jul 2020
@lorenanicole has been invited to edit this submission.
whedon
on 28 Jul 2020
Dear @kthyng thank you very much starting the process for review at JOSS. As you suggested we went through the list of reviewers and tried to identify potential reviewers with the relevant expertise and interest. You can see their usernames below.
felixhenninger, davekinkead, Andytwoods, mbod, adammichaelwood, tresoldi
Thank you very much and we are excited to experience JOSS review process.
onurvarol
on 30 Jul 2020
@lorenanicole Just a quick ping to check out this submission to see if you can take it on!
kthyng
on 3 Aug 2020
@whedon invite @lorenanicole as editor
a different type of ping
danielskatz
on 4 Aug 2020
@lorenanicole has been invited to edit this submission.
whedon
on 4 Aug 2020
Sure! Let's go for it.
lorenanicole
on 14 Aug 2020
@whedon assign me as editor
lorenanicole
on 14 Aug 2020
OK, the editor is @lorenanicole
whedon
on 14 Aug 2020
@whedon check repository
lorenanicole
on 14 Aug 2020
Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper
whedon
on 14 Aug 2020
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=0.52 s (220.3 files/s, 167381.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 39 10830 12986 51612
CSS 8 108 95 7475
JSON 41 2 0 1340
Sass 3 86 0 551
Markdown 9 196 0 380
HTML 5 55 5 335
SVG 1 0 0 288
TeX 1 12 0 103
Ruby 2 10 2 38
Bourne Shell 3 20 8 29
Python 1 12 0 24
YAML 1 0 0 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 114 11331 13096 62180
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '2530' was gathered on 2020/08/14.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
[email protected] 26 75173 576 49.72
uluturki 46 75636 971 50.28
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
[email protected] 74456 99.0 12.2 17.36
uluturki 74776 98.9 13.0 17.63
@onurvarol wow what a collection of potential reviewers you have collected here. As we need two, do you have particular recommendations on whom to prioritize first?
lorenanicole
on 14 Aug 2020
@lorenanicole, we want to have multiple options, incase they might not be available. Feel free to choose any two reviewers, they are all have interests and expertise that might match with the project.
onurvarol
on 14 Aug 2020
OK, that works @onurvarol !
lorenanicole
on 17 Aug 2020
@nhejazi, your name was provided as a possible reviewer for this submission for JOSS. Would you be interested in reviewing?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
lorenanicole
on 17 Aug 2020
@rdrr1990, your name was provided as a possible reviewer for this submission for JOSS. Would you be interested in reviewing?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
lorenanicole
on 17 Aug 2020
Unfortunately, I will not be able to provide a timely review at this time due to outstanding commitments and deadlines.
nhejazi
on 18 Aug 2020
Dear @lorenanicole, @nhejazi was unavailable and @rdrr1990 haven't responded. How should we proceed?
onurvarol
on 30 Aug 2020
Dear @lorenanicole it's been almost a month since we last attempted to assign a reviewer for our submission. Can we make another attempt?
onurvarol
on 29 Sep 2020
@onurvarol let's pull in some more folks. Thank you!
lorenanicole
on 29 Sep 2020
@emilydolson & @ajoer your names were provided as a possible reviewer for this submission for JOSS. Would you be interested in reviewing?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
lorenanicole
on 29 Sep 2020
@onurvarol if we find we are still casting too wide a net, it can be better for us to better microtarget individuals. We can timebox this for a shorter time window. I'll flag to circle back by end of week.
lorenanicole
on 29 Sep 2020
@emilydolson & @ajoer your names were provided as a possible reviewer for this submission for JOSS. Would you be interested in reviewing?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
Hi. Just bumping this! Thanks!
lorenanicole
on 2 Oct 2020
@onurvarol did you happen to have from your list of reviewers any explicit names to target? Since we have such a large list I wonder if we'd have better success by strategically reaching out to folks that you can shortlist for us.
lorenanicole
on 7 Oct 2020
@lorenanicole earlier I listed a larger list of potential reviewers but we only tried to reach out couple of them. Please help me invite from the list below, they are all have relevant experience and interest on this project.
felixhenninger, davekinkead, Andytwoods, mbod, adammichaelwood, tresoldi
onurvarol
on 7 Oct 2020
Thanks @onurvarol that sounds great!
lorenanicole
on 7 Oct 2020
@adammichaelwood & @davekinkead would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
lorenanicole
on 7 Oct 2020
I do not have capacity for that at this time.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020, 2:17 PM Lorena Mesa notifications@github.com wrote:
@adammichaelwood https://github.com/adammichaelwood & @davekinkead
https://github.com/davekinkead would you be willing to review this
submission for JOSS?We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow
these guidelines:
https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2530#issuecomment-705198772,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANRU4JC3CV3SYMKP7VY2HDSJTLHTANCNFSM4PKUDEHQ
.
adammichaelwood
on 7 Oct 2020
@lorenanicole happy to review this
davekinkead
on 8 Oct 2020
@felixhenninger, we're looking for one more editor for this JOSS submission! Would you be willing to review this?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
lorenanicole
on 8 Oct 2020
@whedon assign @davekinkead as reviewer
lorenanicole
on 8 Oct 2020
OK, @davekinkead is now a reviewer
whedon
on 8 Oct 2020
Great, @davekinkead! Once we have another reviewer confirmed, we'll open up a review issue for you!
lorenanicole
on 8 Oct 2020
Hey @lorenanicole and @onurvarol I would be happy to review this package. I and my colleagures are actively working in the area of Twitter data collection and manual annotations, and would love to check out this package.
I just wrapped 2 of my pending reviews and have room for more.
Availablity: Fom 23rd Oct onwards. Let me know if it works for you guys.
sara-02
on 14 Oct 2020
:wave: @lorenanicole - I'm going to go ahead and add @sara-02 here as a reviewer and move this to review.
arfon
on 25 Oct 2020
@whedon add @sara-02 as reviewer
arfon
on 25 Oct 2020
OK, @sara-02 is now a reviewer
whedon
on 25 Oct 2020
@whedon start review
arfon
on 25 Oct 2020
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2780.
whedon
on 25 Oct 2020
@davekinkead, @sara-02 - thank you both so much for agreeing to review this submission! @lorenanicole will be your editor over in #2780 - I'm just helping out here as one of the EiCs on rotation to move this forward.
See you over in #2780 where the actual review will take place.
arfon
on 25 Oct 2020
Related issues
whedon
·
119Comments
whedon
·
142Comments
whedon
·
113Comments
whedon
·
175Comments
whedon
·
151Comments