Submitting author: @waxlamp (Roni Choudhury)
Repository: https://github.com/girder/viime
Version: v0.1.0
Editor: @lpantano
Reviewers: @joannawolthuis, @rowlandm
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @waxlamp. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@waxlamp if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84 T=1.62 s (105.8 files/s, 11806.1 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vuejs Component 60 810 218 7984
Python 40 1057 324 3601
JavaScript 24 199 144 2159
R 15 371 323 620
JSON 5 0 0 351
YAML 3 25 0 314
SVG 5 0 0 117
Markdown 2 31 0 95
INI 2 20 0 73
TypeScript 3 12 2 60
HTML 1 6 3 45
Pug 3 7 0 41
Mako 1 7 0 18
Bourne Again Shell 2 2 0 16
XML 1 0 0 9
Bourne Shell 1 1 0 4
Dockerfile 1 2 0 4
CSS 1 0 0 4
Stylus 1 0 0 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 171 2550 1014 15518
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '2358' was gathered on 2020/06/18.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Brandon Davis 61 2864 1334 20.18
Daniel Chiquito 4 11 15 0.12
Jeffrey Baumes 8 96 7 0.50
Jonathan Beezley 112 7024 3811 52.07
Mike VanDenburgh 3 12 5 0.08
Roni Choudhury 35 442 191 3.04
Samuel Gratzl 201 3745 1209 23.81
subdavis 1 13 28 0.20
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Brandon Davis 1452 50.7 11.8 8.33
Daniel Chiquito 11 100.0 0.4 9.09
Jeffrey Baumes 36 37.5 9.5 2.78
Jonathan Beezley 2935 41.8 12.1 3.41
Mike VanDenburgh 7 58.3 0.4 14.29
Roni Choudhury 187 42.3 10.2 8.02
Samuel Gratzl 2856 76.3 7.8 4.38
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper
Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...
👋 @waxlamp - Thanks for your submission to JOSS. As described in our blog post announcing the reopening of JOSS, we're currently working in a "reduced service mode", limiting the number of papers assigned to any individual editor.
Since reopening JOSS earlier in the month we've had a very large number of papers submitted and as such, yours has been put in our backlog that we will be working through over the coming weeks and months.
Thanks in advance for your patience!
Hi @arfon, thanks for your help!
The submission instructions had me suggest one reviewer from the list: Lorena Pantano seemed like a good fit for our paper.
@whedon invite @lpantano as editor
:wave: @lpantano - would you be able to take on this submission for us?
@lpantano has been invited to edit this submission.
@whedon assign @lpantano as editor
OK, the editor is @lpantano
@whedon check references
@whedon commands
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer
# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer
# Re-invite a reviewer (if they can't update checklists)
@whedon re-invite @username as reviewer
# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor
# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive
# Set the software version at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set v1.0.1 as version
# Open the review issue
@whedon start review
EDITORIAL TASKS
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name
# Remind an author or reviewer to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@whedon remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
# Ask Whedon to do a dry run of accepting the paper and depositing with Crossref
@whedon accept
# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references
# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository
EiC TASKS
# Invite an editor to edit a submission (sending them an email)
@whedon invite @editor as editor
# Reject a paper
@whedon reject
# Withdraw a paper
@whedon withdraw
# Ask Whedon to actually accept the paper and deposit with Crossref
@whedon accept deposit=true
@whedon check references
Hi @sctyner, @rowlandm, @joannawolthuis,
based on your experience maybe you be interested in reviewing this tool?
I could do this, but the turn around time would be end of July.
Regards,
Rowland Mosbergen
Strategy Analyst | Big Data Analytics & Digital Transformation Lead |
Diversity & Inclusion
B of Eng (Aerospace Avionics)
Mob: 0423 030 626
Email: rowland.[email protected]
Web: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rowlandm-gaicd/
El mié., 24 de jun. de 2020 08:02, Lorena Pantano notifications@github.com
escribió:
Hi @sctyner https://github.com/sctyner, @rowlandm
https://github.com/rowlandm, @joannawolthuis
https://github.com/joannawolthuis,based on your experience maybe you be interested in reviewing this tool?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2358#issuecomment-648451425,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADGRUVKLCGC73QQAVF5HH3RYERBBANCNFSM4OBRBM4Q
.
Thank you @rowlandm, I may wait a couple of days, but if not I will assign you as a reviewer.
@Nienke, based on your GitHub experience maybe you be interested in reviewing this tool?
Hi Lorena! I'm interested, what are the expectations exactly? :)
---------- Forwarded message ---------
Van: Lorena Pantano notifications@github.com
Date: wo 24 jun. 2020 om 00:02
Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: Viime: Visualization
and Integration of Metabolomics Experiments (#2358)
To: openjournals/joss-reviews joss-reviews@noreply.github.com
Cc: joannawolthuis jcwolthuis93@gmail.com, Mention <
[email protected]>
Hi @sctyner https://github.com/sctyner, @rowlandm
https://github.com/rowlandm, @joannawolthuis
https://github.com/joannawolthuis,
based on your experience maybe you be interested in reviewing this tool?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2358#issuecomment-648451425,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEAG4ZLOD43XGBOB354RZN3RYERBBANCNFSM4OBRBM4Q
.
@joannawolthuis, thank you! this are the guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html and we normally expect reviews in two weeks or so. It should be a pretty nice experience :)
@whedon assign @joannawolthuis as reviewer
OK, @joannawolthuis is now a reviewer
@lpantano you had a typo :-)
I am not available at this time. Thanks.
@ionlights, would you be interested to review this tool, I think you visualization experience could help to review this nice tool. Thanks
@whedon add @rowlandm as reviewer
OK, @rowlandm is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2410.
Sorry Lorena,
I had to decline as my position is not being extended and I have to look
for work add a priority outside of research software.
Regards,
Rowland Mosbergen
Strategy Analyst | Big Data Analytics & Digital Transformation Lead |
Diversity & Inclusion
B of Eng (Aerospace Avionics)
Mob: 0423 030 626
Email: rowland.[email protected]
Web: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rowlandm-gaicd/
El jue., 25 de jun. de 2020 21:45, Lorena Pantano notifications@github.com
escribió:
Thank you @rowlandm https://github.com/rowlandm, I may wait a couple of
days, but if not I will assign you as a reviewer.—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2358#issuecomment-649490086,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADGRUTXWSVXE537XFE32T3RYM2EBANCNFSM4OBRBM4Q
.