Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: SampleDB: A sample and measurement metadata database

[whedon]

Submitting author: @FlorianRhiem (Florian Rhiem)
Repository: https://github.com/sciapp/sampledb
Version: v0.8.1
Editor: @trallard
Reviewers: @eteq, @dvanic

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @FlorianRhiem. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@FlorianRhiem if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting to check references...

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

```Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

• None

MISSING DOIs

• None

INVALID DOIs

• None
  ```

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @trallard, could you edit this one for us?

[trallard]

Sure send this my way!

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon assign @trallard as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @trallard

[trallard]

Hi @FlorianRhiem 👋 I will be serving as the editor for this submission.
The first thing we have to do is find 2 or more reviewers for this.

Do you already have some folks in mind? if not you can check our list of reviewers available here 👉🏼 https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

[FlorianRhiem]

Hello @trallard, I just went through the list and perhaps eteq, usethedata and/or jsta would be willing to review this?

[trallard]

Ok let's ping the reviewers now :sparkles:

@eteq Erik, would you be able and willing to review this submission?
@usethedata Bruce, would you be able and willing to review this submission?
@jsta Joseph, would you be able and willing to review this submission?

Some important information:

• Our reviewer guidelines can be found here https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
• Title: SampleDB: A sample and measurement metadata database
• GitHub repository: https://github.com/sciapp/sampledb
• Submitting author: @FlorianRhiem Florian Rhiem

We are looking at finding two reviewers to move this submission forward.

[eteq]

I can do this review, although it might take some time due to the holidays and related travel/vacation

[FlorianRhiem]

@eteq Thank you, that would be great! :)

@trallard It's been two weeks, should we wait for a reply from @usethedata or @jsta due to the holidays, or should I look for other reviewer candidates from the google doc?

[jsta]

@trallard I cannot take on a reviewing task at this time. Best of luck!

[FlorianRhiem]

@trallard Perhaps celliern, dvanic, remram44, fabianomenegidio and/or atrisovic could do the review?

[FlorianRhiem]

@trallard May I ping them with an updated version of your comment, will you ping them, or how do we continue? I'm feeling somewhat lost regarding the process at the moment.

[trallard]

@celliern, @dvanic, @remram44 @fabioanomenegidio, @astrisovic I am the editor for this submission and we are looking for at least 2 reviewers. Would you be able/willing to review this submission?

Some important information:

Our reviewer guidelines can be found here https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

• Title: SampleDB: A sample and measurement metadata database
• GitHub repository: https://github.com/sciapp/sampledb
• Submitting author: @FlorianRhiem Florian Rhiem

[trallard]

/ooo today until February 10, 2020

[ooo[bot]]

:+1: Marked @trallard as OOO from Monday, February 3rd 2020 to Monday, February 10th 2020. :calendar:

[trallard]

@whedon assign @eteq as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @eteq is now a reviewer

[dvanic]

Yes, I'm happy to review this submission.

On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 05:31, whedon [e-mail] wrote:

OK, @eteq https://github.com/eteq is now a reviewer

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1949?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAY65OSDPG6JNQKPTONENZLRBBPHRA5CNFSM4J2CJGG2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEKU4TLA#issuecomment-581552556,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAY65OVHZXW4H4LH7LCNVGTRBBPHRANCNFSM4J2CJGGQ
.

[trallard]

Thanks @dvanic!

[trallard]

@whedon add @dvanic as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @dvanic is now a reviewer

[arfon]

@trallard - this looks like it's ready to move to review unless I'm missing something?

[trallard]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2107.