Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: CapacityExpansion: A capacity expansion modeling framework in Julia

[whedon]

Submitting author: @YoungFaithful (Lucas Elias Kuepper)
Repository: https://github.com/YoungFaithful/CapacityExpansion.jl
Version: v0.2.0
Editor: @katyhuff
Reviewers: @sjpfenninger, @ali-ramadhan

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @YoungFaithful. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@YoungFaithful if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting to check references...

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #1892 with the following error:

/app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/find.rb:43:in block in find': No such file or directory - tmp/1892 (Errno::ENOENT) from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/find.rb:43:incollect!'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/find.rb:43:in find' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-74bc29a6a731/lib/whedon/processor.rb:61:infind_paper_paths'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-74bc29a6a731/bin/whedon:50:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:inrun'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:indispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-74bc29a6a731/bin/whedon:116:in from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in

'

[labarba]

@arfon — I could not find (again) the name of the team to ping for tech issues. Help!

[labarba]

I think maybe the authors provided the wrong repository URL. They provided https://github.com/YoungFaithful/CapacityExpansion.jl/tree/paper.

I will change it to https://github.com/YoungFaithful/CapacityExpansion.jl and try to re-compile.

[labarba]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #1892 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[labarba]

@YoungFaithful — Where is your JOSS paper? I poked around in the repo but could not find it.

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf from branch paper

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch paper. Reticulating splines etc...

[arfon]

@YoungFaithful — Where is your JOSS paper? I poked around in the repo but could not find it.

Looks like it's in the paper branch @labarba.

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[labarba]

👋 @katyhuff — Could you handle this submission as editor? It is in the area of energy systems management.

[whedon]

```Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

• 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.023 is OK
• 10.21105/joss.01573 is OK
• 10.1137/15M1020575 is OK
• 10.1137/141000671 is OK
• 10.3390/en12061153 is OK
• 10.21105/joss.00825 is OK
• 10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.043 is OK
• 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.012 is OK

MISSING DOIs

• None

INVALID DOIs

• None
  ```

[labarba]

@whedon assign @katyhuff as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @katyhuff

[labarba]

@katyhuff — I have assigned this submission for you to edit, in view of the topic and current editor loads. Let me know if you see any issues.

[YoungFaithful]

I think that @sjpfenninger would be a great reviewer.

[sjpfenninger]

Happy to review; but would probably only get to it in the 1st week of December.

[YoungFaithful]

@katyhuff thanks for being the editor. What are the next steps that I can do?

[katyhuff]

Sorry for the delay in getting this one moving.

Thanks for agreeing to review @sjpfenninger .

@lheagy or @ali-ramadhan , would either of you be available to review this submission?

[katyhuff]

@whedon assign @sjpfenninger as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @sjpfenninger

[ali-ramadhan]

Hi @katyhuff sorry for the very slow reply.

I wasn't sure if I'd have enough time to review this submission but I can do it this week.

[sjpfenninger]

@katyhuff This seems to be ready to move to review but has stalled?

[katyhuff]

Ah! I'm sorry. Yes. This fell completely off of my radar. Thank you for the ping.

[katyhuff]

@whedon add @ali-ramadhan as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @ali-ramadhan is now a reviewer

[katyhuff]

@ali-ramadhan , I hope you are still able to conduct this review. Thank you for agreeing. Apologies for the oversight.

[katyhuff]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2034. Feel free to close this issue now!