Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: ClustForOpt: Time-series aggregation for optimization in Julia

Created on 11 Jul 2019  Â·  27Comments  Â·  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @holgerteichgraeber (Holger Teichgraeber)
Repository: https://github.com/holgerteichgraeber/ClustForOpt.jl
Version: v0.4.2
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @jgoldfar, @ahwillia

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @holgerteichgraeber. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@holgerteichgraeber if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
Julia TeX pre-review

All 27 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

PDF failed to compile for issue #1562 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Just went through the list. Some ideas for potential reviewers:

  • Jgoldfar
  • matbesancon
  • ChrisRackauckas
  • ahwillia

:wave: @danielskatz - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

👋 @jgoldfar & ChrisRackauckas & @ahwillia - Would two of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@danielskatz I would be happy to review; this would be my first time doing so for JOSS.

Thanks @jgoldfar - I'll put you in the system, but we won't start the review until I get one more reviewer as well.

@whedon assign @jgoldfar as reviewer

OK, the reviewer is @jgoldfar

I'm traveling for the next few weeks. I can do it in a pinch in ~3 weeks
time. Perhaps wait and see if there's a quicker response from someone
else...

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 5:47 PM whedon notifications@github.com wrote:

OK, the reviewer is @jgoldfar https://github.com/jgoldfar

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1562?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAE3NUJBHNEC3J2KZGDLOT3P7TV77A5CNFSM4IBFWPH2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZ7CFHY#issuecomment-511582879,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE3NUL464K7AGNFAHFGYKLP7TV77ANCNFSM4IBFWPHQ
.

Thanks @ahwillia - let's see if @ChrisRackauckas (who I didn't tag correctly above - sorry) is willing to review this.

👋 @ChrisRackauckas - Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

Not right now. If it gets to September and it still needs a review then give me a ping.

👋 @ahwillia - Given that you've said you can do this in a pinch, I will ask you to do so, recognizing that it won't happen quickly.

@whedon add @ahwillia as reviewer

OK, @ahwillia is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1573. Feel free to close this issue now!

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings