Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: SeleDiff: A fast and scalable tool for estimating and testing selection differences between populations

Created on 1 Jul 2019  Â·  38Comments  Â·  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @xin-huang (Xin Huang)
Repository: https://github.com/xin-huang/SeleDiff
Version: v.1.0.0
Editor: @lpantano
Reviewers: @stulacy, @suresh-lab

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @xin-huang. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@xin-huang if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
Java TeX pre-review

Most helpful comment

well, I can do it as well if there is already two reviewers :)

All 38 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

PDF failed to compile for issue #1536 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

Hi @mgymrek and @lpantano, can one of you take this? (Perhaps one of you can take this submission and the other can take #1535...)

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

PDF failed to compile for issue #1536 with the following error:

Error reading bibliography ./paper.bib (line 5, column 5):
unexpected "Y"
expecting space, ",", white space or "}"
Error running filter pandoc-citeproc:
Filter returned error status 1
Looks like we failed to compile the PDF

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

PDF failed to compile for issue #1536 with the following error:

Error producing PDF.
! Missing delimiter (. inserted).

{
l.373 [text{median}left{

Looks like we failed to compile the PDF

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

Potential reviewers could be @stulacy and @Suresh-lab

Happy to help!

Great, thanks to you both @stulacy and @suresh-lab! I will add you as reviewers, but we are still waiting to get an editor assigned to handle the submission and start the review.

@whedon add @stulacy as reviewer

@whedon add @suresh-lab as reviewer

Hi @mgymrek, just another ping about handling this submission—we already have two reviewers ready to go!

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

well, I can do it as well if there is already two reviewers :)

@lpantano sounds good, thanks! 😀

@whedon assign @lpantano as editor

OK, the editor is @lpantano

👋 @lpantano - btw, you can assign yourself as editor too (via whedon), once you volunteer :)

@whedon check references

Attempting to check references...

```Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

  • 10.1002/ece3.1261 is OK
  • 10.1073/pnas.1019276108 is OK
  • 10.1093/molbev/msw211 is OK
  • 10.1101/gr.192336.115 is OK
  • 10.1093/molbev/msu211 is OK
  • 10.1111/mec.13559 is OK
  • 10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133526 is OK

MISSING DOIs

  • None

INVALID DOIs

  • None
    ```

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1545. Feel free to close this issue now!

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings