Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: Wikipedia2Vec: An Optimized Tool for Learning Embeddings of Words and Entities from Wikipedia
Submitting author: @ikuyamada (Ikuya Yamada)
Repository: https://github.com/wikipedia2vec/wikipedia2vec
Version: v1.0.3
Editor: @usethedata
Reviewers: @ionlights
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ikuyamada. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@ikuyamada if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
whedon
All 29 comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
What happens now?
This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:
You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.
whedon
on 26 May 2019
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
PDF failed to compile for issue #1479 with the following error:
/app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/find.rb:43:in block in find': No such file or directory - tmp/1479 (Errno::ENOENT)
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/find.rb:43:incollect!'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/find.rb:43:in find'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-379fcd917139/lib/whedon/processor.rb:61:infind_paper_paths'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-379fcd917139/bin/whedon:50:in prepare'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:inrun'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:indispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-379fcd917139/bin/whedon:116:inload'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in
whedon
on 26 May 2019
@whedon generate pdf
danielskatz
on 26 May 2019
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
👋 @ikuyamada - what's going on between https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1477 and this submission?
danielskatz
on 26 May 2019
@danielskatz Thank you for your comments and I am sorry to bother you. I mistakenly withdrew the previous paper. It would be appreciated if we can proceed based on this submission.
ikuyamada
on 26 May 2019
👋 @usethedata - would you also be willing to edit this submission?
danielskatz
on 26 May 2019
:wave: Hey @danielskatz...
Letting you know, @usethedata is currently OOO until Saturday, June 1st 2019. :heart:
![ooo[bot] picture](https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/in/7872?v=4&s=40)
ooo[bot]
on 26 May 2019
@whedon assign @usethedata as editor
kyleniemeyer
on 3 Jun 2019
OK, the editor is @usethedata
whedon
on 3 Jun 2019
Working on finding reviewers. Sorry for my delay.
usethedata
on 16 Jun 2019
Two declines and a deferral on reviewers. Going back to look for additional options. Suggestions welcomed.
usethedata
on 20 Jun 2019
@ikuyamada Still working on finding reviewers, but having some challenges. Any suggestions you have will be appreciated.
usethedata
on 22 Jun 2019
@usethedata Thank you for working on finding reviewers of my article! However, I don't understand what kind of suggestions that are needed here. Are there a list of any reviewer candidates of this journal or can I recommend any researchers that are capable of reviewing this paper?
ikuyamada
on 22 Jun 2019
@ikuyamada What I'm looking for is if you know someone, who does not have a conflict of interest with you (see our conflict of interest policy and who would be qualified to review the work. We have a list of people who've volunteered as reviewers, but I've already been working through that lists, looking for people with NLP and Python expertise.
usethedata
on 22 Jun 2019
@usethedata I am sorry but I do not come up with any suitable reviewers.
ikuyamada
on 23 Jun 2019
@ikuyamada Understood. Thanks for checking. Let me dig further.
usethedata
on 23 Jun 2019
👋 @jkahn @linuxscout @alexhanna @ionlights We're looking for a couple of reviewers for a JOSS paper "Wikipedia2Vec: An Optimized Tool for Learning Embeddings of Words and Entities from Wikipedia". Would any of you be willing to take this on? Thanks much for considering.
usethedata
on 28 Jun 2019
@usethedata hey, sorry for the late reply. i'll give this a look in a few hours and get back to you. 👍
ionlights
on 28 Jun 2019
👋 @ionlights Thoughts?
usethedata
on 8 Jul 2019
👋 @ionlights Thoughts?
@usethedata i think i can give this a review. it's my first review with JOSS. 😅i've given the following a look-over, as that all i need to know – aside from domain-specific knowledge?
- https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
- https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
- https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html
i'll most likely be able to give this a look during my flights later this week, so if someone else chimes in, just let me know.
ionlights
on 8 Jul 2019
@ionlights Thanks much. I am looking for a second reviewer (and have a couple of options). If I can get one in the next couple of days, I'll open up the review issue then. If I'm still looking by Wednesday evening, I'll open the review issue with just one reviewer and add the second one manually. When I open the review issue, you'll see a checklist there for you, and that's where there would be any discussion about the review.
usethedata
on 9 Jul 2019
@whedon assign @ionlights as reviewer
usethedata
on 9 Jul 2019
OK, the reviewer is @ionlights
whedon
on 9 Jul 2019
I'm still working on getting a second reviewer. But in the interests of letting the review move forward, I'm opening the review issue and will manually add a second reviewer after we find one.
usethedata
on 11 Jul 2019
@whedon start review
usethedata
on 11 Jul 2019
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1558. Feel free to close this issue now!
whedon
on 11 Jul 2019
Related issues
whedon
·
12Comments
whedon
·
12Comments
whedon
·
12Comments
whedon
·
13Comments
whedon
·
8Comments
Most helpful comment
@ionlights Thanks much. I am looking for a second reviewer (and have a couple of options). If I can get one in the next couple of days, I'll open up the review issue then. If I'm still looking by Wednesday evening, I'll open the review issue with just one reviewer and add the second one manually. When I open the review issue, you'll see a checklist there for you, and that's where there would be any discussion about the review.