Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: WatchMe: Software for Reproducible Monitoring and Data Collection

[whedon]

Submitting author: @vsoch (Vanessa Sochat)
Repository: https://www.github.com/vsoch/watchme
Version: 0.0.13
Editor: @brainstorm
Reviewers: @andreysmelter and @crew102

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vsoch. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@vsoch if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[labarba]

👋 @brainstorm — The author suggested you as handling editor, and it looks like this work is in your sphere of interests. I'll assign you now, but let me know if you're disinclined for any reason.

[labarba]

@whedon assign @brainstorm as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @brainstorm

[vsoch]

Thanks @whedon, @labarba, and @brainstorm!

Suggestions for reviewers: @petar, @mdmurbach, @andreysmelter, @crew102

[brainstorm]

Yeah, @labarba, happy to edit, @vsoch's software is usually delicious :)

[andreysmelter]

Thanks @whedon, @labarba, and @brainstorm!

Suggestions for reviewers: @petar, @mdmurbach, @andreysmelter, @crew102

Hi all, I will be happy to review @vsoch software paper!

[crew102]

I’m down for a review as well

[brainstorm]

Sweet, let's have you two onboard then.

[brainstorm]

@whedon assign @crew102 as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @crew102

[brainstorm]

@whedon assign @andreysmelter as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @andreysmelter

[brainstorm]

@whedon assign @andreysmelter and @crew102 as reviewers

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @andreysmelter and @crew102

[brainstorm]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1388. Feel free to close this issue now!

[vsoch]

Thanks @brainstorm @whedon ! Looking forward to it.

[arfon]

@whedon assign @andreysmelter and @crew102 as reviewers

@brainstorm Whedon didn't do quite what you expected here, we need to assign one at a time. I'll go ahead and fix up the review issue...

[vsoch]

Thanks @arfon, I'll keep an eye out for this in the future too. :)