Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: JuliaCall: an R package for seamless integration between R and Julia

[whedon]

Submitting author: @Non-Contradiction (Changcheng Li)
Repository: https://github.com/Non-Contradiction/JuliaCall
Version: v0.16.4
Editor: @leouieda
Reviewers: @matbesancon, @aguang

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Non-Contradiction. The JOSS editor Pending, will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@Non-Contradiction if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

:wave: @leouieda - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[leouieda]

@arfon sure, I'd be happy to do it :+1:

I'll look through the reviewer list to see if anyone has R and Julia experience. @Non-Contradiction let me know if you have any suggestions for reviewers. There is a list of potential reviewers here.

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @leouieda as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @leouieda

[leouieda]

:wave: Hi @ChrisRackauckas @Aguang @matbesancon @r-barnes @nhejazi @dmbates would any of you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS?

[matbesancon]

Yes I can review this submission

[ChrisRackauckas]

I won't be able to review until sometime in April.

[aguang]

I can also review

[dmbates]

I can also review.

[leouieda]

@matbesancon @aguang @dmbates thank you for agreeing to review! :tada: @ChrisRackauckas no worries since we have 3 reviewers already.

[leouieda]

@dmbates initially we only need 2 reviewers so I'll go with the order of response. Thank you for volunteering and I'll keep you in mind if we need a third reviewer (if that's ok with you).

[leouieda]

@whedon assign @matbesancon as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @matbesancon

[leouieda]

@whedon add @aguang as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @aguang is now a reviewer

[dmbates]

@dmbates initially we only need 2 reviewers so I'll go with the order of response. Thank you for volunteering and I'll keep you in mind if we need a third reviewer (if that's ok with you).

Certainly. Thanks for letting me know.

[leouieda]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1284. Feel free to close this issue now!

[leouieda]

@matbesancon @aguang @Non-Contradiction the review will take place in #1284. Please feel free to ping me at any time if you have questions.

@matbesancon @aguang there are instructions in the issue and a link to our review guidelines. When you open issues and/or pull requests in the software repo, please link back to the review issue so we can keep track of progress by including openjournals/joss-reviews#1284 in the text.