Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets

[whedon]

Submitting author: @codeling (Bernhard Fröhler)
Repository: https://github.com/3dct/open_iA
Version: 2018.12
Editor: @katyhuff
Reviewers: @trallard, @behollister

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @codeling. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@codeling if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @katyhuff it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for the assigned editor (@katyhuff) to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience :smile_cat:

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[arfon]

:wave: @katyhuff - the submitting author suggested you as the handling editor.

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[katyhuff]

Hi @codeling, thanks for this submission. I'm sorry for the delay. I'm back in action now. Now, @codeling , let's ping a few fitting reviewers, with C++ and Python expertise as well as some background in data visualization, image analysis, and/or computed tomography. We can start the review once two or three of them accept the request to review.

Dear potential reviewers (@krischer @rrrlw @camillescott ),

Based on your expertise in C++ and Python, data visualization, image analysis, and/or computed tomography, I would like to ask if you can help us out with a submission to JOSS (The Journal of Open Source Software), where I’m an editor.

Title: open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets
Summary: Visual analysis and processing of volumetric datasets, with a focus on industrial computed tomography
Wiki: https://github.com/3dct/open_ia/wiki
Topic: Data visualization, signal processing, imaging
Article Proof: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.01139/joss.01139/10.21105.joss.01139.pdf
Submitting author: @codeling (Bernhard Fröhler)
Repository: https://github.com/3dct/open_iA
Version: 2018.12

@krischer : Lion, are you able to and interested in taking on this review?
@rrrlw : Raoul, are you able to and interested in taking on this review?
@camillescott : Camille, are you able to and interested in taking on this review?

Your prompt response is appreciated. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html for more information about reviewer criteria and the process if it is new to you.

[rrrlw]

Hello, although open_iA looks phenomenal, I do not have the expertise necessary to review it. :(

My apologies; best of luck with the submission!

[katyhuff]

Thank you for letting us know, @rrrlw .

@codeling : Can you suggest any reviewers? It would be helpful to me if you can think of anyone. The folks on this list are already reviewers for JOSS. If there is someone else that you would like to suggest, please let me know. Though they will need to be free of any conflict of interest, you may be aware of individuals in your community who would be good reviewers for this submission.

[krischer]

Thanks for considering me but that is pretty removed from my area of expertise so I would not feel very comfortable doing this. Judging from the posted list @behollister and @ngoldbaum seem like a pretty good fit to review this.

[codeling]

From the list, I could imagine @jochym and @trallard might also be a good fit!

[katyhuff]

Both would be excellent if they have the time, indeed.

Pawel (@jochym) and Tania (@trallard), based on your expertise, I would like to ask if you can help us out by volunteering to review this submission to JOSS.

Title: open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets
Summary: Visual analysis and processing of volumetric datasets, with a focus on industrial computed tomography
Wiki: https://github.com/3dct/open_ia/wiki
Topic: Data visualization, signal processing, imaging
Article Proof: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.01139/joss.01139/10.21105.joss.01139.pdf
Submitting author: @codeling (Bernhard Fröhler)
Repository: https://github.com/3dct/open_iA
Version: 2018.12

[trallard]

Hello, @katyhuff and @codeling 👋 I would be happy and interested in reviewing this submission.

I will try to move this forward as quick as possible but I might also be rather busy over the upcoming weeks

[katyhuff]

@whedon assign @trallard as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @trallard

[katyhuff]

@behollister and @ngoldbaum , would either of you be available to and interested in reviewing this JOSS submission? I agree that you like have the expertise. Do you have the time? We'd like at least two reviewers. @trallard has thankfully already agreed, so we're looking for one or two more.

Title: open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets
Summary: Visual analysis and processing of volumetric datasets, with a focus on industrial computed tomography
Wiki: https://github.com/3dct/open_ia/wiki
Topic: Data visualization, signal processing, imaging
Article Proof: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.01139/joss.01139/10.21105.joss.01139.pdf
Submitting author: @codeling (Bernhard Fröhler)
Repository: https://github.com/3dct/open_iA
Version: 2018.12

[behollister]

Hi,

Yes, I can review the submission. When is the deadline?

Regards,

Brad

Brad E. Hollister, Ph.D.

Department of Computer Science
Californian State University Dominguez Hills
Office: NSM B218
Phone: [phone]

---

From: Katy Huff [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 6:04 AM
To: openjournals/joss-reviews
Cc: Dr. Brad Hollister; Mention
Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets (#1139)

@behollisterhttps://github.com/behollister and @ngoldbaumhttps://github.com/ngoldbaum , would either of you be available to and interested in reviewing this JOSS submission? I agree that you like have the expertise. Do you have the time? We'd like at least two reviewers. @trallardhttps://github.com/trallard has thankfully already agreed, so we're looking for one or two more.

Title: open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets
Summary: Visual analysis and processing of volumetric datasets, with a focus on industrial computed tomography
Wiki: https://github.com/3dct/open_ia/wiki
Topic: Data visualization, signal processing, imaging
Article Proof: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.01139/joss.01139/10.21105.joss.01139.pdf
Submitting author: @codelinghttps://github.com/codeling (Bernhard Fröhler)
Repository: https://github.com/3dct/open_iA
Version: 2018.12

-
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1139#issuecomment-455182816, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATcY0nW8GOy3t7V-kBbHzz4jX8d_ZtZnks5vEIMEgaJpZM4Zd3Zf.

[katyhuff]

Thaknks @behollister ! We aim to complete the review process quickly, so I typically expect a reviewer to get started with their review during the week following assignment, complete their initial review within a week or so thereafter, and remain active with the back-and-forth until the paper is accepted (can be as quick as a week, but is often 3 weeks, and occasionally longer.) If a deadline is helpful to you, I can certainly assign one, though I typically do not.

Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html for more information about reviewer criteria and the process.

[katyhuff]

@whedon add @behollister as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @behollister is now a reviewer

[katyhuff]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1185. Feel free to close this issue now!

[katyhuff]

Thanks for volunteering, both. Two reviewers will likely be sufficient for this review, I'll contribute a bit to the review as well. Let's get started over in #1185 .