Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: TensorFlow.jl: An Idiomatic Julia Front End for TensorFlow

[whedon]

Submitting author: @malmaud (Jonathan Matthew Malmaud)
Repository: https://github.com/malmaud/TensorFlow.jl
Version: v0.10.1
Editor: @arokem
Reviewers: @jekbradbury

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @malmaud. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@malmaud if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @arokem it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[arfon]

:wave: @arokem - the submitting author suggested you as the handling editor

[whedon]

:point_right: Check article proof :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[oxinabox]

I suggest @jekbradbury might be a good reviewer; though he's not reviewed for JOSS before.
He is familiar with julia, and is on the Google TensorFlow team.
But has never contributed to TensorFlow.jl.

[arokem]

@whedon set @arokem as editor

[arokem]

@whedon assign arokem as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is arokem

[arokem]

👋 @jekbradbury, would be interested in reviewing this article for JOSS?

You can read about the JOSS review process here

[jekbradbury]

Sure, I'd be happy to.

[arokem]

@whedon assign @jekbradbury as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @jekbradbury

[arokem]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1002. Feel free to close this issue now!

[arokem]

@jekbradbury : thanks for agreeing to review this contribution. Please head over to #1002, where you will find your reviewer check-list. I will close this one.