Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: hIPPYlib: An Extensible Software Framework for Large-Scale Inverse Problems

Created on 28 Aug 2018  路  28Comments  路  Source: openjournals/joss-reviews

Submitting author: @uvilla (Umberto Villa)
Repository: https://github.com/hippylib/hippylib
Version: 2.1.0
Editor: @lheagy
Reviewers: @IgorBaratta, @boehmc

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @uvilla. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@uvilla if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
C++ Python Shell pre-review

All 28 comments

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon commands

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

馃毀 馃毀 馃毀 Experimental Whedon features 馃毀 馃毀 馃毀

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

Suggested reviewers

  • @IgorBaratta: hIPPYlib relies on FEniCS for the discretization of the PDE, and for generating weak forms for the adjoint and incrementals problem. Since @IgorBaratta is a FEniCS developer he might be interested in reviewing hIPPYlib.

  • @lheagy: She is working on inverse problem with geophysical applications

:wave: @lheagy - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

@whedon list reviewers

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

Hi @arfon, I am happy to edit this submission!

Hi @arfon, I am happy to edit this submission!

Great, thanks @lheagy!

:wave: Hi @IgorBaratta, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

@whedon assign @lheagy as editor

OK, the editor is @lheagy

Hi @IgorBaratta, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

Hi @lheagy , I'd be glad to review this submission.

Excellent, thanks @IgorBaratta! I have sent out a few messages to other potential reviewers (hopefully we get 2).

@whedon assign @IgorBaratta as reviewer

OK, the reviewer is @IgorBaratta

Thank you to @lheagy for serving as editor and @IgorBaratta for serving as reviewer!

Hi @uvilla and @IgorBaratta, just a quick update - I have found another reviewer and am just waiting to get his github information. We can get the review started from there. Thanks for your patience!

Thank you @lheagy

@whedon add @boehmc as reviewer

OK, @boehmc is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/940. Feel free to close this issue now!

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings