Submitting author: @bmorris3 (Brett Morris)
Repository: https://github.com/bmorris3/aesop
Version: v0.1
Editor: @jakevdp
Reviewers: @wtgee
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @bmorris3. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@bmorris3 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @arfon it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...
:wave: @bmorris3. I'll be the handling editor for this submission.
Could you please take a look at this list of potential reviewers and see if there are any that might be suitable? https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers
Also, if you know of any potential reviewers _not_ on this list, feel free to mention them here!
👋 @arfon. Some potential reviewers include: @jakevdp, @manodeep, @wtgee
@whedon commands
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer
# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer
# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor
# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive
# Open the review issue
@whedon start review
🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
@whedon assign @jakevdp as editor
OK, the editor is @jakevdp
@manodeep or @wtgee, would you be willing to serve as a reviewer for this submission?
@manodeep has privately declined via Twitter, no response yet from @wtgee. Perhaps @nespinoza?
Hi @bmorris3; would love to, but I'm swamped right now and currently already reviewing a paper. Might I reccommend @rabrahm (https://github.com/rabrahm)?
Hi folks, thanks for asking. I can help out with the review but won't get
to it until this weekend.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 6:18 AM Néstor Espinoza notifications@github.com
wrote:
Hi @bmorris3 https://github.com/bmorris3; would love to, but I'm
swamped right now and currently already reviewing a paper. Might I
reccommend @rabrahm https://github.com/rabrahm (
https://github.com/rabrahm)?—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/832#issuecomment-407881679,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEUUG2ncHszzNeCpSaLTdLkSUQA8MF3ks5uKNKGgaJpZM4Vb6ly
.
--
~Wilfred Tyler Gee
@bmorris3 @jakevdp My apologies for not being able to review. I know nothing about echelle spectra and only a little bit of python.
I'll be following the review process guide but let me know if there is otherwise something I should know as this is my first JOSS review. Thanks!
@whedon add @wtgee as reviewer
I'm sorry @bmorris3, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.
@whedon add @wtgee as reviewer
OK, @wtgee is now a reviewer
@whedon start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/854. Feel free to close this issue now!