Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: EmissV: An R package to create vehicular and other emissions by Top-down methods to air quality models

[whedon]

Submitting author: @Schuch666 (Daniel Schuch)
Repository: https://github.com/atmoschem/EmissV
Version: 0.664.3
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @nuest

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Schuch666. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@Schuch666 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[Schuch666]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer

# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

[arfon]

@whedon list reviewers

[whedon]

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

[Schuch666]

@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.1208113 as archive

[whedon]

I'm sorry @Schuch666, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.

[Schuch666]

Hi @arfon , is it possible to suggest you as editor?

[arfon]

@Schuch666 - could you take a look at the reviewer list (https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers) and see if you could suggest a few potential reviewers?

[arfon]

Hi @arfon , is it possible to suggest you as editor?

:-) Sure thing. I'd like to find a couple of reviewers first.

[Schuch666]

thank you @arfon

[Schuch666]

May I suggest @benmarwick and/or @nuest for reviewers? I read their profiles and I believe they have a good background for reviewing. Thanks again.

[arfon]

@benmarwick @nuest would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[nuest]

Yes.

[arfon]

@whedon assign @arfon as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @arfon

[arfon]

@whedon assign @nuest as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @nuest

[arfon]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/662. Feel free to close this issue now!

[arfon]

@nuest - please head over to #662 to carry out the actual review.

[benmarwick]

oops, sorry to be slow, I can review also.

[arfon]

oops, sorry to be slow, I can review also.

Great, thanks @benmarwick - that would be excellent. I'll update the review issue over in #662.