Joss-reviews: [PRE REVIEW]: rucrdtw: Fast time series subsequence search in R

[whedon]

Submitting author: @pboesu (Philipp Boersch-Supan)
Repository: https://github.com/pboesu/rucrdtw
Version: v0.1.0
Editor: @arfon
Reviewer: @masalmon

What this issue is for

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pboesu. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @arfon it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[arfon]

@whedon list reviewers

[whedon]

Here's the current list of JOSS reviewers: https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/docs/reviewers.csv

[arfon]

👋 @masalmon - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[maelle]

Ok I will! :-)

[arfon]

Ok I will! :-)

Wonderful, thanks!

[arfon]

@whedon assign @masalmon as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @masalmon

[arfon]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

You didn't say the magic word! Try this:

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[arfon]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/100. Feel free to close this issue now!

[arfon]

@masalmon - let's continue the review over in #100

[noamross]

May I volunteer as a second reviewer for this? I watch the submissions feed for rOpenSci pass-throughs and this one interests me.

[pboesu]

Thanks for you interest @noamross (And of course thanks for agreeing to review @masalmon)

I briefly considered rOpenSci for this, but felt it was in the "standalone statistical tools" category. I'd be more than happy to have a shot in making this compliant with the onboarding criteria, though, if you both think this would fit into the rOpenSci ecosystem!

[noamross]

Hi @pboesu. I was just telling @arfon that I'm watching this repo to track packages going from RO to JOSS through our joint submittal approach. You are correct, rucrdtw wouldn't fit in the rOpenSci scope. I just have done some time series stuff and thought I'd take the chance to explore DTW more deeply by reviewing your package.

[arfon]

May I volunteer as a second reviewer for this? I watch the submissions feed for rOpenSci pass-throughs and this one interests me.

Absolutely. Please feel free to also contribute your review over in #100 @noamross