Jitsi-meet: Meta - accessibility issues
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/5992
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/5852
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/5817
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/5789
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/5739
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/5681
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/5308
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/3590
https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/6089
saghul
All 6 comments
It seems like there should be an accessibility label that could be used to aggregate these issues in the future. We know that there are going to be more issues.
mgifford
on 13 May 2020
Should those issues be closed or not? I thought they should stay open until they're actually resolved.
missmatsuko
on 13 May 2020
I would agree with @missmatsuko; only duplicates should be closed.
luixxiul
on 15 May 2020
Just discussed it, closing this issue as we used it basically as a label. This has now been replaced by adding a accessibility label to any issues in question. They have been reopened @missmatsuko. Sorry for any confusions caused!
l3d00m
on 16 May 2020
But let us keep this issue pinned, because people hopefully address existing issues first.
Echolon
on 17 May 2020
I disagree, nobody will look through a closed pinned issue that only contains the issue numbers. It's much easier to use the search for it. I'd also say that that logic could apply to any issue, not just accessibility, as they aren't really different.
l3d00m
on 17 May 2020
Related issues
tanvir23
路
4Comments
xiefangzhenz
路
3Comments
mlelyakan
路
4Comments
mdosch
路
3Comments
VogtAI
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
It seems like there should be an accessibility label that could be used to aggregate these issues in the future. We know that there are going to be more issues.