When beforeAll fails, none of the other tests actually execute, but they all fail with the same reason, and they all print the same error.
Jest should avoid printing the individual tests if beforeAll fails. Right now the implementation just checks if there is an error and if yes, print it and fail the test without actually executing it.
Note that @SimenB asked me to create this https://github.com/facebook/jest/issues/6695#issuecomment-619405847.
Run a beforeAll() that fails where a couple of tests are executed after. This is the failure received (with the supplied repro below):
FAIL src/test.unit.test.js
test that a 3rd party API remains consistent
โ API function 1
โ API function 2
โ API function 3
โ test that a 3rd party API remains consistent โบ API function 1
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: "successful"
Received: "login"
1 | describe('test that a 3rd party API remains consistent', () => {
> 2 | beforeAll(() => expect('login').toBe('successful')); // this will fail
| ^
3 | test('API function 1', () => expect(1).toBe(1)); // each...
4 | test('API function 2', () => expect(2).toBe(2)); // ...of these...
5 | test('API function 3', () => expect(3).toBe(3)); // ...will fail too
at src/test.unit.test.js:2:35
โ test that a 3rd party API remains consistent โบ API function 2
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: "successful"
Received: "login"
1 | describe('test that a 3rd party API remains consistent', () => {
> 2 | beforeAll(() => expect('login').toBe('successful')); // this will fail
| ^
3 | test('API function 1', () => expect(1).toBe(1)); // each...
4 | test('API function 2', () => expect(2).toBe(2)); // ...of these...
5 | test('API function 3', () => expect(3).toBe(3)); // ...will fail too
at src/test.unit.test.js:2:35
โ test that a 3rd party API remains consistent โบ API function 3
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: "successful"
Received: "login"
1 | describe('test that a 3rd party API remains consistent', () => {
> 2 | beforeAll(() => expect('login').toBe('successful')); // this will fail
| ^
3 | test('API function 1', () => expect(1).toBe(1)); // each...
4 | test('API function 2', () => expect(2).toBe(2)); // ...of these...
5 | test('API function 3', () => expect(3).toBe(3)); // ...will fail too
at src/test.unit.test.js:2:35
Test Suites: 1 failed, 1 total
Tests: 3 failed, 3 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 1.037s
Jest should avoid printing the individual tests if beforeAll fails. It is highly confusing for users.
describe('test that a 3rd party API remains consistent', () => {
beforeAll(() => expect('login').toBe('successful')); // this will fail
test('API function 1', () => expect(1).toBe(1)); // each...
test('API function 2', () => expect(2).toBe(2)); // ...of these...
test('API function 3', () => expect(3).toBe(3)); // ...will be reported as failed too
});
System:
OS: Linux 4.15 Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS (Bionic Beaver)
CPU: (4) x64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6132 CPU @ 2.60GHz
Binaries:
Node: 12.15.0 - ~/.config/nvm/12.15.0/bin/node
npm: 6.13.4 - ~/.config/nvm/12.15.0/bin/npm
npmPackages:
jest: 25.1.0 => 25.1.0
Hi ๐
Can I work on this issue?
Yeah, that'd be lovely! Feel free to ask questions if you get stuck or want a pointer ๐
I'd start in jest-circus (jest-jasmine is soft-deprecated, so unless you want to you can ignore it). Maybe the approach in #7201 might help you get started?
When beforeAll fails, it also ignores it.only and logs all tests as failing: https://repl.it/repls/MobileBaggyLearning
Wasn't sure if this bug will already be fixed by #10004 so please let me know if you'd like me to file a new issue!
Hi! Has there been any progress on this issue? :)