Jest hard-fails with an exit code if the git branch is named package.json
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
fix/package.jsonjest --coverageJest runs as normal
Jest errors because it perceives the git reference marker file as a JSON file (because of the filename) and attempts to parse that reference marker as JSON (which it isn't, and never would be)

> jest --coverage
Error: Cannot parse /Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/.git/refs/heads/fix/package.json as JSON: Unexpected token e in JSON at position 0
at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/jest-haste-map/build/worker.js:167:15)
at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
at asyncGeneratorStep (/Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/jest-haste-map/build/worker.js:78:24)
at _next (/Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/jest-haste-map/build/worker.js:98:9)
at /Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/jest-haste-map/build/worker.js:103:7
at new Promise (<anonymous>)
at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/jest-haste-map/build/worker.js:95:12)
at Object.worker (/Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/jest-haste-map/build/worker.js:120:18)
at execFunction (/Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/jest-worker/build/workers/processChild.js:155:17)
at execHelper (/Users/c050004/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/jest-worker/build/workers/processChild.js:139:5)
npm ERR! Test failed. See above for more details.
System:
OS: macOS 10.15.3
CPU: (8) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770HQ CPU @ 2.20GHz
Binaries:
Node: 10.16.3 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v10.16.3/bin/node
Yarn: 1.19.1 - /usr/local/bin/yarn
npm: 6.14.4 - ~/Documents/git/logger/node_modules/.bin/npm
npmPackages:
jest: ^25.3.0 => 25.3.0
jest-haste-map tries to crawl .git/, that seems... suboptimal. We should have some sort of sane default ignore list
Also
jest-haste-mapshouldn't be trying to parse a directory as a file
It doesn't, .git/refs/heads/fix/package.json is a file containing the commitish
diff --git i/packages/jest-haste-map/src/crawlers/node.ts w/packages/jest-haste-map/src/crawlers/node.ts
index c8254bd36..fe4d62385 100644
--- i/packages/jest-haste-map/src/crawlers/node.ts
+++ w/packages/jest-haste-map/src/crawlers/node.ts
@@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ function find(
let activeCalls = 0;
function search(directory: string): void {
+ const justDir = directory.split(path.sep).pop();
+
+ if (justDir?.startsWith('.')) {
+ if (activeCalls === 0) {
+ callback(result);
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
activeCalls++;
fs.readdir(directory, {withFileTypes: true}, (err, entries) => {
activeCalls--;
@@ -121,7 +130,7 @@ function findNative(
callback: Callback,
): void {
const args = Array.from(roots);
- args.push('-type', 'f');
+ args.push('-type', 'f', '-not', '-path', '*/\\.*');
if (extensions.length) {
args.push('(');
}
Seems to fix it. Are there use cases for not ignoring hidden directories?
We could also add '<rootDir>/\\.', or something to default modulePathIgnorePatterns, that also fixes it.
@jeysal @thymikee ideas? Watchman crawler skips it, not sure if watchman behavior or if we query it asking it to skip it
I think it would be a sane default to skip dotfiles in modulePathIgnorePatterns and document (add a note?) how to enable this scenario (people put their tests in node_modules/ directories, so I can imagine someone is using a dotfile for the same thing :P)
馃憢 Hey folks, I just created a PR following the suggestion of @thymikee.
My main issue with fixing this issue via an ignore pattern is that if people override that pattern, watchman would still ignore it, but other crawlers would not. Which is why I think maybe fixing the crawlers is a better solution?
Oh, thanks for the PR @leonardovillela, very much appreciated 馃槂
@SimenB I agree with you. But I think even in crawlers solution it should be configurable to cover the case when people put tests and stuff in hidden files.
Does this make sense to you?
Right, but that will only work for those not using watchman
Yes, I'm trying to maintain the fix with ignore pattern and change the watchman crawler to consider hidden files on fs operations, do you think this is a good approach?
@SimenB I noticed some strange thing, I've watchman installed on my machine and I tested my PR with modulePathIgnorePatterns as the default value(ignoring hidden files) and without ignoring hidden files (e.g: modulePathIgnorePatterns: []) and in both scenarios watchman handle it correctly. So looks like the watchman is not ignoring hidden files.
Did I notice as well that all tests passed in my PR, the CI job is executed in a machine with a watchman installed?
Can you check out my PR locally and test it too?
My machine env info is:
$ npx envinfo --preset jest
System:
OS: macOS 10.15.4
CPU: (8) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8257U CPU @ 1.40GHz
Binaries:
Node: 12.16.2 - ~/.asdf/installs/nodejs/12.16.2/bin/node
Yarn: 1.22.4 - ~/.asdf/installs/nodejs/12.16.2/.npm/bin/yarn
npm: 6.14.4 - ~/.asdf/installs/nodejs/12.16.2/bin/npm
npmPackages:
jest: ^25.4.0 => 25.4.0
$ watchman --version
4.9.0
To reproduce the error, I did the following locally (in the jest repo).
$ git checkout -b package.json
$ ./jest
# tests run fine
$ ./jest --no-watchman
# haste map explodes during boot
Might be that watchman just ignores .git directory and not hidden files in general?
Yes, I took a look in this page on watchman docs and looks like it ignores .git by default.
Ah, good find! Let's try to emulate that in the other crawlers then, and not mess with hidden files in general. So just skip the VCS roots?
Yes, but we want this skip to be configurable? Other crawlers you say are only jest-haste-map/src/crawlers/node.ts? The VCS roots to be skipped can be the same as watchman(.git, .svn, and .hg)?
I don't think we need to make it configurable for now. Somebody can complain if they really need it, but I don't really see a use case for tests in a VCS directory (while I can imagine use cases for tests in other hidden directories).
And yes, we only need to update the node crawler (which also has find in it)
In the next days, I'll update my PR to follow this approach.
Most helpful comment
I don't think we need to make it configurable for now. Somebody can complain if they really need it, but I don't really see a use case for tests in a VCS directory (while I can imagine use cases for tests in other hidden directories).
And yes, we only need to update the node crawler (which also has
findin it)