Jest: Use coveralls instead of CodeCov

Created on 28 Aug 2018  路  7Comments  路  Source: facebook/jest

馃殌 Feature Proposal

Use coveralls instead of codecov for coverage reporting

Motivation

  • Coveralls is a great tool, and is even recommended by InstanbulJS itself (doc)
  • Coveralls is used by many popular JavaScript projects like Facebook's ReactJS, React-native, VueJS, Bootstrap etc
  • Codecov had an full-blown outage yesterday (status), coveralls also had outages but it's limited to job processing backlogs (status)

Most helpful comment

Yeah that was pretty unfortunate

I'm not sure how the rest of the community feels but I'm personally pretty empathetic to the occasional downtime and since it can happen to everyone I'm not compelled to switch for just that reason

All 7 comments

Coveralls is a great tool, and so is Codecov which is also used by many popular JS libs

Is there a compelling feature we would get from Coveralls we don't have with Codecov that justifies switching and losing all of the coverage history we have in Codecov?

The CodeCov unavailability from yesterday was a dealbreaker for me as a developer (tweet)
I couldn't find an easy way to export coverage history from CodeCov to CoverAlls, I've asked them on twitter (tweet)

Yeah that was pretty unfortunate

I'm not sure how the rest of the community feels but I'm personally pretty empathetic to the occasional downtime and since it can happen to everyone I'm not compelled to switch for just that reason

Closing as there's no compelling feature to switch to Coveralls

Guys, do you know anything about browser extensions? Why author has removed them?

(

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings