Feature Request: Jabref should show a inspect button in the Mr Dlib tab. By clicking on this one it shows the user, which dataset is sent to the server.
A journalist who organizes a critical paper with Jabref can get in danger (in some states) just because Jabref whispers...
One could add a "reload icon ↺" and a checkbox [x] autoreload in the corner of the tab. The user can manually request a data transfer, if autoreload is off, or enable autoreload. Besides that its always present where it happens and the user does not need to search in preferences.
Perhaps the user does not want to autoreload, when surfing via gsm, but when back in the wlan. So he/she can switch on and off easily.

I guess this is more than just MR DLib. Which are the services you trust? We have many features that communicate with external web services like dblp, google scholar, ACM, dx.doi, medline, IEEE, etc.. where do you draw the border?
A service should never send data per default without user action. If a user looks up a doi, it is a manual action. The data which is sent is the data the user entered in the form field. Here it is clear for the user which data is sent when. The user should have the choice to decide. This is not the case, if a service is syncing automatically per default.
Of course a inspect which data will be sent button can be interesting for all other services too for debugging and the interested user.
Another option might be the following:
Although I'm maybe in the minority here with my opinion, but I think the current version is totally fine.
I know data privacy is a sensitive area and shouldn't be taken lightly, but c'mon there is an end to everything.
Devcall has decided that we go with @koppor's solution: before activating the mr.dlib there should be a high-level description of the feature and the data sent, then the user can decide to activate this feature or not.
Mr.Dlib is currently opt-out which is possible inside the preferences. Will will discuss and closely monitor if we make it opt-in and disabled by default in the future.
Most helpful comment