I'm wondering what's the best way to do a refinement/decode that may have multiple validations/errors that need to be returned.
In particular I'd like to implement the error handling method as espoused in Railway Oriented Programming: https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/rop/. Errors are treated as Domain Events and you check for events in a tagged union of the accumulated errors at the end of a workflow/pipeline.
When checking a particular string, such as email, I may want to check for multiple properties and return them as error codes (as opposed to strings). These error codes could wrap data, for example:
{_tag: 'InvalidEmail', value: 'someinvalidemail@adfsdfa'}
// This works
const decoder: Decode<string> = { decode: (x) => D.failure('Can only put a string here') }
// Type error
const decoder: Decode<string> = { decode: (x) => D.failure(['String must end in period.', 'string must be in all lowercase']) }
// Type error
const decoder: Decode<string> = { decode: (x) => D.failure([{ _tag: 'NoPeriod' }, { _tag: 'MustBeLowercase'}]) }
// Type error
const decoder: Decode<string> = { decode: (x) => D.failure([{ _tag: 'NoPeriod' }, { _tag: 'MustBeLowercase'}]) }
I would imagine the DecodeError type should be generic to allow the user to specify complex shapes to hold the errors.
https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/rop/ -> Trying to follow patterns espoused here-particularly the stuff around error handling as "messages".
The alternative is to define a new type for each validation case. Eg:
const Email = D.string
const EmailWithAtSign = { decode: (x): x is EmailWithAtSign => ... }
const EmailWithPeriod = { decode: (x): x is EmailWithDomain => ... }
| Software | Version(s) |
| ---------- | ---------- |
| io-ts | 2.2 |
| fp-ts | n/a |
| TypeScript | n/a |
I would imagine the DecodeError type should be generic to allow the user to specify complex shapes to hold the errors.
@chrischen Please expand on this, how you'd define Decoder? How you will combine this new kind of decoders?
For custom errors I think maybe provide a semigroup or monoid?
This is the shape of the error type I've implemented, where A is the decoded type.
Either<DomainErrors, [A, DomainMessages]>
But actually on second thought I think custom errors may not be necessary. If the default error system can just accumulate an arbitrary list of user defined errors that should be fine.
It's hard to use the current error reporting unless I just use them as is. If I wrap a decoder then I lose out on granular type errors. I'd like to be able to rely on the error types to do my own logic such as converting the codes to messages. It's also good to have them in one place in case localization is needed.
So I'd like to be able to not be limited to string errors. I'm using this tagged type as an example as the value field can be used to pass the context of what the bad input was. Current concatenation of errors should still work right?
const decoder: Decode<string> = { decode: (x) => D.failure({ type: 'EmailInvalidError': value: 'invalid@email' }) }
So I looked through the source and found withExpected which can let me override the default error reporting, but it's still limited to strings. I think instead of Tree
Here is what I'm trying to get my error handling to look like:
https://fsprojects.github.io/Chessie/railway.html
https://fsprojects.github.io/Chessie/reference/chessie-errorhandling-result-2.html
Also on a slightly unrelated note, intersection(a, b) does not report errors for b if a has a decode failure, whereas union and type are reporting all the errors.
Also on a slightly unrelated note, intersection(a, b) does not report errors for b if a has a decode failure, whereas union and type are reporting all the errors.
Thanks for reporting, fixed in v2.2.6
@chrischen this is the more general form of a "decoder" I can think of
export interface DecoderT<M extends URIS2, E, A> {
readonly decode: (u: unknown) => Kind2<M, E, A>
}
where the error E and (even) the effect M are not yet specified (DecoderT is kind of a "monad transformer").
Then you can define some constructors
export const fromGuard = <M extends URIS2, E>(M: MonadThrow2C<M, E>) => <A>(
guard: G.Guard<A>,
onError: (u: unknown) => E
): DecoderT<M, E, A> => {
return {
decode: (u) => (guard.is(u) ? M.of(u) : M.throwError(onError(u)))
}
}
and primitives
export const string = <M extends URIS2, E>(M: MonadThrow2C<M, E>) => (
onError: (u: unknown) => E
): DecoderT<M, E, string> => {
return fromGuard(M)(G.string, onError)
}
Here you can find a POC.
As you can see from the tests, depending on the chosen MonadThrow instance, you can define
I pushed this thing further, I got a more fleshed out Kleisli module (branch 478) from which I can derive:
Decoder.ts: re-implementation of Decoder.ts but uses FreeSemigroup instead of NonEmptyArray as semigroup and this DecoderError module as errorsTaskDecoder.ts: async decoders@chrischen for what concerns the original issue, Kleisli is fully configurable so you should be able to use your own errors
Example
import * as E from 'fp-ts/lib/Either'
import * as NEA from 'fp-ts/lib/NonEmptyArray'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/lib/pipeable'
import * as G from '../src/Guard'
import * as K from '../src/Kleisli'
type MyError = { type: 'string' } | { type: 'NonEmptyString' }
interface Decoder<A> {
readonly decode: (u: unknown) => E.Either<NEA.NonEmptyArray<MyError>, A>
}
const M = E.getValidation(NEA.getSemigroup<MyError>())
const string: Decoder<string> = K.fromRefinement(M)(G.string.is, () => [{ type: 'string' }])
const NonEmptyString: Decoder<string> = pipe(
string,
K.refine(M)(
(s): s is string => s.length > 0,
() => [{ type: 'NonEmptyString' }]
)
)
console.log(NonEmptyString.decode(null)) // { _tag: 'Left', left: [ { type: 'string' } ] }
console.log(NonEmptyString.decode('')) // { _tag: 'Left', left: [ { type: 'NonEmptyString' } ] }
Awesome! This matches my workaround of wrapping the decoder to return my own error. When do you expect this to be released?
Closed by https://github.com/gcanti/io-ts/pull/486
Would this work together with the default Decoder or would I have to create my own decoders for all types im interested in, e.g. D.type since the error type changed? Is it easy enough to use io-tss decoders when using my own errors?
Nvm, realized I had to create my own Decoder module, which now works great, thanks for the Kleisli module 馃憤
Most helpful comment
@chrischen this is the more general form of a "decoder" I can think of
where the error
Eand (even) the effectMare not yet specified (DecoderTis kind of a "monad transformer").Then you can define some constructors
and primitives
Here you can find a POC.
As you can see from the tests, depending on the chosen
MonadThrowinstance, you can defineDecoderfromDecoderT