What did you expect to see that you didn't?
The image shouldn't get repeat after the increment of width.

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Please follow the issue template to help us help you πππ
If you have screenshots to share demonstrating the issue, that's really helpful! πΈ You can make a gif too!
@jywarren Please review this issue, is this a valid?
if it is valid I would like work on this issue
@amreshk005 Thanks for opening the issue.I also noticed this bug earlier.I think expected behaviour should be to add whitespace as it does with the height.It must be an easy fix as behaviour of height is correct which just need to make some changes with height as well.Go ahead!!
@HarshKhandeparkar what do you think?
@amreshk005 , @keshav234156
I think Crop means to cut out unwanted part from Image either Horizontally (along Width) or Vertically (along height). Thus, the user must not write values greater than Orignal width and height of the Image. There should be error whenever User fills greater value in Width or Height.
Thanks π
@keshav234156 , @amreshk005
Rather we should ask user to enter PERCENTAGE of WIDTH/HEIGHT Crop. It will look much professional and will be much easier for user to crop by adding % value as every user is not familiar with the dimensions of the Image he is working on.
@jywarren If you say that this idea is good.! Then I would open an issue for it as well and I know exactly what to do for making this happen.
I think Vaibhav is right here. That would be much better but we will still have to add error handling because user can enter >100%.
@amreshk005 you can add that as a possible fix to this issue body itself.
Amresh can still work on the issue.
@amreshk005 Please confirm it once if you are working on it?
if YES, then please keep giving the updates regarding the issue so that I and @HarshKhandeparkar can plan for further actions on this module. Thanks π
@vaibhavmatta @HarshKhandeparkar I would like to work on this.
@amreshk005 Plz do it. Tag me up wherever you feel stuck.
Happy Coding!
@amreshk005 any updates?
Are you still working on it?
Hi all, just noting that I think there are moments when "overcropping" is
useful, where you want to add white space around an image. So perhaps we
could solve this by adding a conditional for whether a pixel is outside the
original bounds, and adding either white or fully transparent pixels?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 4:18 PM VAIBHAV MATTA notifications@github.com
wrote:
@amreshk005 https://github.com/amreshk005 any updates?
Are you still working on it?β
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer/issues/1276?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAF6JZNOI5D3RPW6PLETKTQQXZNZA5CNFSM4JBFTWP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECLHAGI#issuecomment-546730009,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAF6J5YCACC6P5IE3ITWJ3QQXZNZANCNFSM4JBFTWPQ
.
@jywarren You are right but this feature doesnβt fits to the exact meaning of CROP . We can make this feature an another module by the name lets say, add base, add bg etc .
Thanks
Actually i think there are some current use cases that do "overcropping" and we shouldn't prevent it even if we later clarify things better. Let's just be sure this can still be possible! Thanks!
we can close this issue as overcropping is helpful also!!!