This will be excellent! save time and effort, please!
I'm not sure exactly what this means, but it sounds like something that is probably best done by the community---perhaps you would volunteer?---and not as part of the standard.
@domenic like below:
and every have own link
Does this work? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML
@Yay295 , i have already know MDN, and also read there document much often 馃槃
but i want a cheetsheet like my top photo, becase it is very simple and concise. and whatwg master html an dom standards. So i hope whatwg can officially produce cheetsheets.
It does seem like a good idea, but until we generate the Indexes in the specification automatically (and could therefore generate this automatically too) I'm afraid it would end up being out-of-date quite quickly. (Unless someone writes a script to produce it from the indexes.)
@annevk , i want to join in whatwg team. i am willing to author this cheetsheet. Can i join you ?
i love you whatwg team very much
@anlexN I think we'd be happy to review your work on a cheatsheet. Whether we want to publish it as part of the HTML Standard and take on the ongoing maintenance burden is a question that should involve more people, but in principle that seems reasonable.
Also, other than there being a requirement to sign https://participate.whatwg.org/agreement in the near future, there's not really a question of joining the WHATWG per se. Basically, if you contribute with suggestions (be it issues or pull requests), you're a contributor of the WHATWG and what you've done thus far definitely qualifies.
(I find myself disagreeing a bit with @domenic's statement earlier, as it's very much the community that maintains the standard. But I suppose he meant the wider web developer community and not the community maintaining the HTML Standard.)
Thank all very much!
So it has almost been a year, has anyone produced a cheatsheet yet?
Most helpful comment
@anlexN I think we'd be happy to review your work on a cheatsheet. Whether we want to publish it as part of the HTML Standard and take on the ongoing maintenance burden is a question that should involve more people, but in principle that seems reasonable.
Also, other than there being a requirement to sign https://participate.whatwg.org/agreement in the near future, there's not really a question of joining the WHATWG per se. Basically, if you contribute with suggestions (be it issues or pull requests), you're a contributor of the WHATWG and what you've done thus far definitely qualifies.
(I find myself disagreeing a bit with @domenic's statement earlier, as it's very much the community that maintains the standard. But I suppose he meant the wider web developer community and not the community maintaining the HTML Standard.)