Sure, this should be straightforward!
Create a metabase instance and point it to postgres and that should be it.
What I meant to say was, for integrating metabase with hasura, you can pretty much ignore hasura and just setup metabase with postgres the way a metabase tutorial would suggest. :)
@coco98 Thanks for your reply.
I now using docker-compose for running Hasura. My question:
public data through schema level pg_temp_1, pg_toast, pg_toast_temp_1)I need some suggestion like this.
For 1, I think that's upto you. How are you planning on deploying metabase in production? With docker compose? If that's the case, then you can put it in the same compose file. In fact, for ease of use you can just put everything in the same compose file and later move it to something else later if you need to.
Reg 2, It would be better to get metabase to use a different internal postgres schema for tracking its own state. But I don't know if that is possible? @shahidhk @dsandip Does metabase have a configuration variable to take a postgres schema to store its own state?
AFAIK, these are the variables that Metabase takes as input, and schema is not one of them:
MB_DB_TYPE
MB_DB_DBNAME
MB_DB_PORT
MB_DB_USER
MB_DB_PASS
MB_DB_HOST
JAVA_TIMEZONE
@coco98 @mnlbox
@coco98, @dsandip Guys I'm adding this as a feature request in Metabase repo. Please vote up that related issue if you like this feature too.
@mnlbox We're using Metabase with certain Postgres instances and here is the recommended way to do this:
MB_DB_NAME)@shahidhk Why you are suggest separate database rather than separate schema? :thinking:
Can you explain a little?
I'm closing this issue. If any of you would like to add something to it, please feel free to re-open it 馃檪
Most helpful comment
AFAIK, these are the variables that Metabase takes as input, and schema is not one of them:
@coco98 @mnlbox