Graphene: Website docs describe unreleased 2.0 version?
It seems that the docs on the Graphene website are for Graphene 2.0 although the current version is still 1.4.1. For instance, the "Mutations" page says that mutation arguments should be defined with a class Arguments, while in 1.4.1 only class Input seems to work.
denisw
All 5 comments
Is graphene 2.0 stable enough for us to start testing with? Is syntax stable?
anisjonischkeit
on 20 Sep 2017
We would also like to hear about the state of 2.0. Docs tell you to use 2.0 (although its a dev release), should we use 2.0 or stay on 1.X for now?
What is the timeline of 2.0?
zahlio
on 22 Sep 2017
I also have similar questions - it would be nice if there was a PR or issue organizing what is left before a 2.0 release (we could even help out, too, if we knew what was needed)
caffodian
on 25 Sep 2017
It's still not tagged so I guess it's not stable enough.
mraak
on 2 Oct 2017
I was waiting for Subscriptions to release the next stable version of Graphene 2.0.
Today, I released Graphene 2.0 (with support to subscriptions) in the GraphQL Summit.
Closing this issue now :)
syrusakbary
on 26 Oct 2017
Related issues
Glyphack
路
3Comments
dfee
路
4Comments
nsh87
路
3Comments
mingzhou
路
3Comments
mraak
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
We would also like to hear about the state of 2.0. Docs tell you to use 2.0 (although its a dev release), should we use 2.0 or stay on 1.X for now?
What is the timeline of 2.0?