Graphback: Validate documentation

[wtrocki]

We mantainers know graphback and docs really well but for someone starting it
could be hard to get in. We looking for feedback and fixes for documentation
Any info/change matters

[NomadXD]

@wtrocki I went through the docs couple of weeks ago and some parts are still confusing. How about we add a comments section at the bottom of the page so that readers will be able to ask questions right in the docs and make clarifications? It'll be easy for both them and us instead of going through explanations in discord. See the attached image. Thanks

[wtrocki]

Great idea. I would go with page extension in docusaurus rather than adding disqus to every page that will be cumbersome and hard to maintain

[jaskeerat789]

The Problem I faced while trying to understand the project a couple of weeks ago was that it had good documentation for a developer already familiar with graphQL. Someone like me had a little difficulty in understanding some jargon though I had some experience in graphQL.

[jaskeerat789]

I also think that we should have a little more detailed doc for the contributors or someone trying to figure out how things work.

[wtrocki]

Outlook:

• Add information about general graphql
• Improve CONTRIBUTING.md file

[wtrocki]

Validation done