Or maybe instead of escaping the function names, do not allow these names at all?
I don't want to tie the language to the the syntax of the compile target too much, at least not yet. I could imagine a future were we compile to Javascript, WASM, Go, etc- would we also add the keywords of those languages to Gleam's reserved words?
Most helpful comment
I don't want to tie the language to the the syntax of the compile target too much, at least not yet. I could imagine a future were we compile to Javascript, WASM, Go, etc- would we also add the keywords of those languages to Gleam's reserved words?