Hello @carloscuesta :sunglasses:!
:open_umbrella: I'm proposing ☂ as a gitmoji to signify changes relating to improving error resilience of the code, so hardening against misconfiguration, API hiccups, things like that. I run an open source project targeting end users, so quite a number of my commits are about "keeping the end user from shooting themselves into the foot" so to speak. I've been using the above emoji for these for a while now.
Can't we abstract your proposal to fall under the umbrella of :lock: (pun intended)?
IMHO an entirely different class of issues and severity.
Hey, I'm not sure I understand what kind of code modifications your proposal is related to, could you please give an example ?
Take a look at these:
I understand.
@vhoyer @carloscuesta @johannchopin What do you think about it ?
I'm pretty much in favor of adding it, but I don't know if it can't be covered by an already existing gitmoji.
Just for the record, if that proposal gets accepted I'd also be happy to file the corresponding PR.
Looks interesting but maybe it is a little bit to specific. If it's about improving dev experience (resilience against misconfiguration) I will recommend to create a DX gitmoji. If its about user error I will just use ♿️
Hey !!! There's already #292 :goal_net: :goal_net: Catching errors for this ! I'm surprised no one knew ^^
Also I'd like to +1 renaming Catching errors to Adding or updating error handling, but why is the issue locked ?
The issue is locked because the PR has already been merged https://github.com/carloscuesta/gitmoji/pull/378
Why that one specifically is locked ? The standard practise is not to lock but only close issues after resolving these.
Because solved issue should not be discussed anymore. I do not lock everyone of them but if I see people is making off-topic comments on a resolved issue that is already closed I lock it.
BTW: Please try to stick with the topic of the issue, please do not move on new topics 🙏
Well, you only answered to "why is the issue locked ?" but not to 🥅 resolving this issue or not and renaming its label or not.
🥅 works for me. Wasn't aware of that yet for some reason. Closing this, thanks everyone for the lively discussion! 👍
Most helpful comment
Just for the record, if that proposal gets accepted I'd also be happy to file the corresponding PR.