Githawk: Add back search to Inbox?

Created on 22 Oct 2017  Â·  8Comments  Â·  Source: GitHawkApp/GitHawk

Has been removed with the recent changes w/ archives and stuff. Do we want to bring this back at some point?

âť” question

All 8 comments

Personally never found search on inbox particularly helpful, granted I'm in a small breed of people who never has more than 20 (until Ryan goes on a storm overnight and I wake up to 50)

I'd honestly find grouping them by repo more helpful, as a way to quickly get to the ones you're more interested about. (Obviously archives should always be in chronological order, _maybe_ with search) Dunno maybe just me!

Thinking about adding it back to the archives view. I never used it on Inbox either.

Sent with GitHawk

Gonna second @Sherlouk re grouping. Some projects take higher priority than others and it’d be awesome to view those first.

Sent with GitHawk

Ok I’ll start brainstorming some ideas. This was actually my v1. The hardest UX is paging. It gets weird when you load more and it’s in another repo.

Maybe we can add a dropdown that lets you select a repo and view its notifications:

https://developer.github.com/v3/activity/notifications/#list-your-notifications-in-a-repository

I’m not sure if the “watched repositories” endpoint is enough to show you all the repos you get notifications for?

https://developer.github.com/v3/activity/watching/#list-repositories-being-watched

Sent with GitHawk

Closing this, haven't felt the need. Feel free to open another issue regarding the grouping.

I have felt the need though of it missing in bookmark search, which only recently fell off. You agree @BasThomas

Yeah, I can see that being an issue if you have many. Can you open a separate issue to track?

I will, I have a bunch of things that seem like issues with the bookmarks refactor and id rather just group them together when Ryan comes back. I’ll def do it though

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

rnystrom picture rnystrom  Â·  3Comments

BasThomas picture BasThomas  Â·  3Comments

rnystrom picture rnystrom  Â·  3Comments

jessesquires picture jessesquires  Â·  3Comments

BasThomas picture BasThomas  Â·  3Comments